首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Reconstruction of the Water Table from Self-Potential Data: A Bayesian Approach
Authors:by A Jardani  A Revil  W Barrash  A Crespy  E Rizzo  S Straface  M Cardiff  B Malama  C Miller  and T Johnson
Institution:Colorado School of Mines, Department of Geophysics, Golden, CO 80401.;
Bureau d'Etudes ALISE, 76160 Saint-Jacques-sur-Darnétal, France.;
INSU-CNRS LGIT UMR 5559, Universitéde Savoie, Equipe Volcans, Le Bourget-du-Lac, 73376 France.;
Center for Geophysical Investigation of the Shallow Subsurface, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725.;
CNRS, UniversitéAix Marseille III, Aix en Provence, 13545 France.;
CNR-IMAA, Hydrogeophysics Laboratory, 85052 Marsico Nuovo (PZ), Italy.;
Dipartimento di Difesa del Suolo, Universita' della Calabria, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy.;
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.;
MSE Technology Applications Inc., Butte, MT 59701.;
Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2107.
Abstract:Ground water flow associated with pumping and injection tests generates self-potential signals that can be measured at the ground surface and used to estimate the pattern of ground water flow at depth. We propose an inversion of the self-potential signals that accounts for the heterogeneous nature of the aquifer and a relationship between the electrical resistivity and the streaming current coupling coefficient. We recast the inversion of the self-potential data into a Bayesian framework. Synthetic tests are performed showing the advantage in using self-potential signals in addition to in situ measurements of the potentiometric levels to reconstruct the shape of the water table. This methodology is applied to a new data set from a series of coordinated hydraulic tomography, self-potential, and electrical resistivity tomography experiments performed at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Idaho. In particular, we examine one of the dipole hydraulic tests and its reciprocal to show the sensitivity of the self-potential signals to variations of the potentiometric levels under steady-state conditions. However, because of the high pumping rate, the response was also influenced by the Reynolds number , especially near the pumping well for a given test. Ground water flow in the inertial laminar flow regime is responsible for nonlinearity that is not yet accounted for in self-potential tomography. Numerical modeling addresses the sensitivity of the self-potential response to this problem.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号