Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Institute of Policy and Management, CAS, Beijing, 100190, China;2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geography Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China;1. King''s College London, United Kingdom;2. University of Reading, United Kingdom;1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET);2. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Unidad Integrada Balcarce, Argentina;1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China;2. Department of Thermal Engineering, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China;3. Technology Center, Angang Steel Co., Ltd., Anshan 114009, China;1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macau, China;2. Qingdao Research Center for Green Development and Ecological Environment, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, No.99 Songling Road, Qingdao, 266061, China;3. Product Certification Department 6, China Quality Certification Centre, Zone 9, No. 188, Nansihuan Xilu, Beijing, 100070, China |
| |
Abstract: | Ecological modernist approaches to climate change are premised upon knowing carbon emissions. I ask how corporate environmental managers know and do carbon, i.e., shape the reality of emissions. I argue that for managers’ practical purposes carbon exists as malleable data. Based on ethnographic fieldwork over a period of 20 months in a Fortune 50 multinational corporation, I show that managers materially-discursively arrange heterogeneous entities – databases, files, paper, words, numbers – in and between office spaces, enabling them to stage emission facts as stable and singular. Employing Annemarie Mol’s work on multiplicity, I show that multiple enactments of carbon hang together not by an antecedent body (CO2) but through ongoing configurations of data practices. Disillusioning promissory economic discourses of ‘internalisation’, I demonstrate: Management is materially premised upon preventing purportedly internalised carbon realities from entering capitalist core processes. This undermines carbon economics’ realist promises. Staging some carbon realities as in control is premised upon managers’ ongoing, reflexive, partial and always situated configuration of, e.g., standards, formal meetings or digital data practices in which humans do carbon-as-data. Carbon practices are materially-discursively aligned, forming a configuration. This configuration effects carbon as a malleable and locally configurable space rather than as a closed fact. Reconstructing managers’ practices as configuring carbon-as-dataspace, I argue, allows grasping adequately the contingency and constraints of managing carbon as a particular material-discursive form of environment. In conclusion I generalise the environmental management office as a space that can be configured to stage, beyond carbon, other global environments as well. |
| |
Keywords: | Accounting Carbon Data Enactment Ontology Configuration |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|