Birds as lines: The production of alternative regimes of environmental management in the aftermath of a toxic disaster |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Catedrático José Beltrán, 2, Paterna, E-46980, Spain;2. Department of Biology and Geology, IES Violant de Casalduch, Avinguda Castelló s/n, Benicàssim, E-12560, Spain;1. Lobachevsky State University of Niznhy Novgorod, 23 Gagarin Prosp., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation;2. A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the RAS, 28 Vavilov Str., Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation;1. Department of Botany, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary;2. MTA-DE “Lendület” Evolutionary Phylogenomics Research Group, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032, Debrecen, Hungary;3. Department of Botany and Nature Conservation, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland;4. Hunyadi u. 55., H-9500 Celldömölk, Hungary;5. Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD-CSIC, C/Américo Vespucio, 26. 41092, Seville, Spain;6. Department of Plant Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Pannonia, Georgikon Faculty, Festetics u. 7., H-8360 Keszthely, Hungary;7. Department of Tisza River Research, MTA Centre for Ecological Research-DRI, Bem tér 18/C. H-4026, Debrecen, Hungary;1. Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, 17071 Girona, Spain;2. Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA;1. National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA;2. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper analyses how in the aftermath of one of the worst environmental disasters ever to occur in Spain – the Aznalcóllar Disaster – various environmentalist and conservationist groups mobilised migratory birds to bring new insights and the need for new precautions to the controversy elicited by the spill. The case study, thus, revolves around how environmentalists established a “hybrid collective action” to draw attention to unconsidered risks and impacts of the disaster and thereby make the case for open debate. Building upon this, I engage with two different, though interrelated, theoretical debates that contribute to a rethinking of environmental management (EM) as a social and materially situated practice. Drawing on the idea of “tactic” (De Certeau, 1984), I draw attention to the devices, actions and procedures that environmentalists carried out to resist attempts to minimise the spill and to undermine administrations’ assumptions of control, coherence and singularity associated the idea of management. Drawing on Tim Ingold’s latest work (2007, 2008, 2011), I analyse environmentalists’ most successful tactic: the enactment of migratory birds as “lines”. Together with other authors in this special issue, I will use this notion to make an argument against some of the assumptions of the “hybrid ontology”. In contrast to more essentialists and static notions of non-human agency and politics, the idea of line is particularly useful as a way of understanding how nature(s) can be effectuated differently and how this leads to the imagining of new regimes of cohabitation, human and non-human management and intervention. |
| |
| Keywords: | Toxic disaster Environmental activism Non-human agency Lines Environmental management |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
