首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Earthquake risk assessment in NE India using deep learning and geospatial analysis
Authors:Ratiranjan Jena  Biswajeet Pradhan  Sambit Prasanajit Naik  Abdullah M. Alamri
Affiliation:The Center for Advanced Modeling and Geospatial Information Systems(CAMGIS),Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology,University of Technology Sydney,NSW 2007,Australia;The Center for Advanced Modeling and Geospatial Information Systems(CAMGIS),Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology,University of Technology Sydney,NSW 2007,Australia;Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering,Sejong University,Choongmu-gwan,209,Neungdong-roGwangin-gu,Seoul 05006,Republic of Korea;Earth Observation Center,Institute of Climate Change,Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,43600 UKM,Bangi,Selangor,Malaysia;Active Fault and Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Research Institute,Pukyong National University,Busan 48513,South Korea;Department of Geology&Geophysics,College of Science,King Saud University,Riyadh 11451,Saudi Arabia
Abstract:Earthquake prediction is currently the most crucial task required for the probability, hazard, risk mapping, and mitigation purposes. Earthquake prediction attracts the researchers' attention from both academia and industries. Traditionally, the risk assessment approaches have used various traditional and machine learning models. However, deep learning techniques have been rarely tested for earthquake probability mapping. Therefore, this study develops a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for earthquake probability assessment in NE India. Then conducts vulnerability using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), Venn's intersection theory for hazard, and integrated model for risk mapping. A prediction of classification task was performed in which the model predicts magnitudes more than 4 Mw that considers nine indicators. Prediction classification results and intensity variation were then used for probability and hazard mapping, respectively. Finally, earthquake risk map was produced by multiplying hazard, vulnerability, and coping capacity. The vulnerability was prepared by using six vulnerable factors, and the coping capacity was estimated by using the number of hospitals and associated variables, including budget available for disaster management. The CNN model for a probability distribution is a robust technique that provides good accuracy. Results show that CNN is superior to the other algorithms, which completed the classification prediction task with an accuracy of 0.94, precision of 0.98, recall of 0.85, and F1 score of 0.91. These indicators were used for probability mapping, and the total area of hazard (21,412.94 km2), vulnerability (480.98 km2), and risk (34,586.10 km2) was estimated.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号