首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

波浪作用下黄河三角洲海底粉土液化特征对比研究
引用本文:宋玉鹏,孙永福,宋丙辉,等. 波浪作用下黄河三角洲海底粉土液化特征对比研究[J]. 海洋学报,2021,43(6):129–138 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2021100
作者姓名:宋玉鹏  孙永福  宋丙辉  董立峰  杜星
作者单位:1.自然资源部第一海洋研究所 海洋工程环境研究中心,山东 青岛 266061;;2.国家深海基地管理中心,山东 青岛 266237;;3.青岛海洋科学与技术试点国家实验室 海洋地质过程与环境功能实验室,山东 青岛 266237
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金(41806079,42007274);青岛海洋科学与技术试点国家实验室鳌山科技创新计划项目(2015ASKJ03)
摘    要:作为一种常见的近海海底灾害地质现象,波致海床液化严重威胁着黄河三角洲地区海底工程设施的安全。粉质海床液化后,海底粉土的结构、物理和力学性质均发生了改变,研究该变化规律尤其是评估液化后海底粉土再次发生液化的可能性具有重要的理论意义和应用价值。本文利用室内动三轴仪对取自黄河三角洲已液化和未液化海底粉土开展了液化试验对比研究,讨论了已液化和未液化海底粉土在孔压增长模式和轴向动应变发展趋势方面的异同,对比分析了二者的液化势。研究结果表明:应变标准比孔压标准更适用于评估黄河三角洲地区海底粉土的液化势;孔压和动应变发展模式均表明与未液化粉土相比,已液化海底粉土再次发生液化的抗力有所提高;已液化和未液化海底粉土归一化孔压比ud/σ3与循环加载次数比N/Nf间相关关系可采用双曲线或指数函数模型进行定量化描述;未液化海底粉土的波致液化临界循环应力比约为0.20,已液化海底粉土的临界循环应力比约为0.35。研究成果有助于加深对海底粉土波致液化特性的认识,亦可为循环应力历史影响下的土体力学性质研究提供参考。

关 键 词:黄河三角洲   海底粉土   再次液化   动三轴试验
收稿时间:2020-06-18
修稿时间:2020-10-19

Comparative study on the liquefaction properties of seabed silt under wave loading in the Huanghe River Delta
Song Yupeng,Sun Yongfu,Song Binghui, et al. Comparative study on the liquefaction properties of seabed silt under wave loading in the Huanghe River Delta[J]. Haiyang Xuebao,2021, 43(6):129–138 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2021100
Authors:Song Yupeng  Sun Yongfu  Song Binghui  Dong Lifeng  Du Xing
Affiliation:1. Marine Engineering Environment Research Center, First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China;;2. National Deep Sea Center, Qingdao 266237, China;;3. Laboratory for Marine Geology and Environment, Pilot National Oceanography Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
Abstract:As a common submarine geological disaster, wave-induced seabed liquefaction seriously threatens the safety of subsea engineering facilities in the Huanghe River Delta. The structure, physical and mechanical properties of seabed soil after wave-induced liquefaction all have changed, so it has important theoretical significance and practical value to study on the evaluation of potential possibility of re-liquefaction of seabed soil after previous liquefaction. In this paper, a series of cyclic triaxial liquefaction tests were conducted on core samples collected from submarine non-liquefied and liquefied zone in the Huanghe River Delta, respectively. The differences between non-liquefied and liquefied seabed soil in the developing trends of pore pressure and axial dynamic strain with cycles were analyzed and discussed, and the corresponding liquefaction potentials were also comparatively evaluated. The test results show that compared to pore pressure, the strain standard is more suitable to evaluate the liquefaction potential of the seabed silt in the Huanghe River Delta. The pore pressure and dynamic axial strain development characteristics indicate that the re-liquefaction resistance of the liquefied seabed silt is improved to some extent compared with the non-liquefied silt. Furthermore, the correlations between the normalized pore pressure ratio ud3 and the normalized cycle ratio N/Nf could be described quantitatively by the hyperbolic or exponential functions for liquefied and non-liquefied seabed silts. Finally, the critical cyclic stress ratio for the non-liquefied seabed silt is around 0.20 compared to 0.35 for the liquefied one in the Huanghe River Delta. The research findings will contribute to deepening the understanding of the wave-induced liquefaction mechanism of seabed silt, and also provide an example reference for the study of the mechanical properties of soil subjected to previous cyclic stress history.
Keywords:Huanghe River Delta  seabed silt  re-liquefaction  cyclic triaxial test
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《海洋学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《海洋学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号