首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of two earthquake early warning location methods
Authors:Jun Li  Xing Jin  Hongcai Zhang  Yongxiang Wei
Affiliation:1. Earthquake Administration of Fujian Province, Fuzhou, 350003, China
2. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, 150080, China
3. Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350002, China
Abstract:According to earthquake catalog records of Fujian Seismic Network, the T now method and the four-station continuous location method put forward by Jin Xing are inspected by using P-wave arrival information of the first four stations in each earthquake. It shows that the four-station continuous location method can locate more seismic events than the T now method. By analyzing the results, it is concluded that the reason for this is that the T now method makes use of information from stations without being triggered, while some stations failed to be reflected in earthquake catalog because of discontinuous records or unclear records of seismic phases. For seismic events whose location results can be given, there is no obvious difference in location results of the two methods and positioning deviation of most seismic events is also not significant. For earthquakes outside the network, the positioning deviation may amplify as the epicentral distance enlarges, which may relate to the situation that the seismic stations are centered on one side of epicenter and the opening angle between seismic stations used for location and epicenter is small.
Keywords:Earthquake early warning   Tnow location method   Earthquake catalog   Four-station continuous location method  
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地震科学(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地震科学(英文版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号