| 水环境质量评价中几种方法的对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄兴国,刘秀花.水环境质量评价中几种方法的对比[J].地下水,2005,27(2):125-126,135. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄兴国 刘秀花 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 长安大学环境科学与环境工程学院,陕西,西安,710054;陕西省水利厅,陕西,西安,710004
2. 长安大学环境科学与环境工程学院,陕西,西安,710054 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对目前水环境质量评价中使用的各方法进行分析,并以西安市水环境质量评价为例, 对模糊综合评价法和模糊信息分配法进行比较.结果表明,模糊信息分配法评价出的结果分辩率高,评价结果准确,更符合实际.
|
| 关 键 词： | 水环境质量评价 模糊综合评价 模糊信息分配 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-1184(2005)02-0125-02 |
Comparison on Several Methods of Quality Evaluation on Water Environment |
| |
| Huang Xingguo,Liu Xiuhua.Comparison on Several Methods of Quality Evaluation on Water Environment[J].Groundwater,2005,27(2):125-126,135. |
| |
| Authors: | Huang Xingguo Liu Xiuhua |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the analyses of existing various methods of evaluation on water environment quality and take the water environment quality of Xi'an city as an example. The article comparing the fuzzy synthetic assessment and the fuzzy information distribution, which indicates that the explanation rate of the result of fuzzy information distribution is higher and its resolution is correct and in accord with the actual reality. |
| |
| Keywords: | Water environment quality evaluation fuzzy synthetic assessment and fuzzy information distribution |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
