| 我国与澳洲资源/储量分类对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谭敏,韩冬梅,马振飞,赖大信.我国与澳洲资源/储量分类对比[J].云南地质,2014,33(3):314-319. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谭敏 韩冬梅 马振飞 赖大信 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 云南锡业集团(控股)有限责任公司,云南个旧,661000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 随着我国企业在澳洲矿业投资越来越多,力度越来越大,资源量/储量成为了对标底估值的关键.通过对澳大利亚JORC分类与我国《固体矿产资源/储量分类》对比研究,认为澳大利亚的资源量/储量和我国的资源/储量理念上有一定的差异,澳大利亚资源量纯属地质概念,储量属于经济、社会概念,两者不能相加.JORC资源量等于我国新分类的资源量与基础储量的总和.JORC证实储量（Proved）高于可采储量（111）,更接近于我国矿山的开拓矿量.其概算储量（Probable）高于我国的预可采储量（122）.
|
| 关 键 词： | JORC规范 资源量 储量 对比分类 |
A RESOURCES/RESERVES CLASSIFICATION COMPARISON BETWEEN CHINA AND AUSTRALIA JORC |
| |
| TAN Min,HAN Dong-mei,MA Zhen-fei,LAI Da-xin.A RESOURCES/RESERVES CLASSIFICATION COMPARISON BETWEEN CHINA AND AUSTRALIA JORC[J].Yunnan Geology,2014,33(3):314-319. |
| |
| Authors: | TAN Min HAN Dong-mei MA Zhen-fei LAI Da-xin |
| |
| Institution: | ( Yunnan Sn Mining Limited Company ( Group), Gefiu 661000) |
| |
| Abstract: | The resource amount/reserves has become the key in the assessment of a tender base. According to the comparison study between China 《Solid Mineral Resources/Reserves Classification》 and Australia JORC Classification, we think there is a certain difference in resource/reserves concept between China and Australia. Australia JORC＇s proved reserves is higher than China minable reserves （ 111 ）, more similar to the development reserves of China Mine. Their probable reserves is higher than our anticipated minable reserves （122）. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
