Reconstructing basin evolution from sedimentary thickness; the importance of palaeobathymetric control, with reference to the North Sea

Abstract The structural evolution of a basin cannot be reconstructed from sedimentary thicknesses alone without data on palaeobathymetry. Two classes of geological horizons, are defined, profiles and traces. Profiles are time-lines and bound depositional units. Traces were formed at a known water depth and contain implicit palaeobathymetric data.
Rock units bounded by traces are diachronous lithostratigraphic units, and the thicknesses of such units are controlled directly by subsidence, while the thicknesses of profile-bounded units may be unaffected by the subsidence or even the palaeotopography of the basin.
Dating fault movement from thickness variations in profile-bounded units is difficult without prior knowledge of the palaeobathymetry, and it is impossible to distinguish between synsedimentary fault movement and onlap to a pre-existing fault scarp from thickness alone.
Reconstruction of the basin history of the North Sea is difficult due to the lack of trace-bounded units in the post-Jurassic. The validity of previously published studies depends largely on the quality and quantity of palaeobathymetric data included. An alternative basin history is proposed based on the few trace-bounded units in the North Viking Graben. This includes rifting episodes in the Triassic and Late Jurassic, and a period of uplift in the Palaeocene.