首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

对IPCC第五次评估报告减缓气候变化国际合作评估结果的解读
引用本文:朱松丽,张海滨,温刚,钱国强. 对IPCC第五次评估报告减缓气候变化国际合作评估结果的解读[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10(5): 340-347. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2014.05.004
作者姓名:朱松丽  张海滨  温刚  钱国强
作者单位:1.国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所,北京 100038;2 北京大学国际关系学院,北京 100871;3 中国清洁发展机制基金管理中心,北京 100045;4 北京中创 碳投科技有限公司,北京 100007
基金项目:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划气候变化谈判综合问题的关键技术研究
摘    要:IPCC第五次评估报告第三工作组报告首次对减缓气候变化国际合作进行了独立成章的评估。主要结论认为,《联合国气候变化框架公约》依然是国际合作主要多边论坛,但对该《公约》基本原则的理解出现分歧,《京都议定书》的表现不尽如人意;目前国际合作机制在架构和参与主体方面日趋多元化;国际合作所面临的主要问题是参与度不够、遵约机制不健全。一个“自下而上”的全球协议、资金和技术激励可以促进广泛参与,贸易措施的介入可以完善气候政策、促进参与和遵约,《公约》外的各种小多边主义通过对接可对《公约》机制起到良好的补充作用。这些评估结论可能对2020年后应对气候变化国际合作产生重要影响。

关 键 词:减缓气候变化  国际合作  IPCC AR5  WGIII  
收稿时间:2014-04-14
修稿时间:2014-05-10

Interpretation of International Cooperation on Mitigation from IPCC Fifth Assessment Report
Zhu Songli,Zhang Haibin,Wen Gang,Qian Guoqiang. Interpretation of International Cooperation on Mitigation from IPCC Fifth Assessment Report[J]. Progressus Inquisitiones DE, 2014, 10(5): 340-347. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2014.05.004
Authors:Zhu Songli  Zhang Haibin  Wen Gang  Qian Guoqiang
Affiliation:1.Energy Research Institute, National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing 100038, China; 2.School of International Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; 3.China CDM Fund Management Center, Beijing 100045, China; 4.Sino Carbon Innovation & Investment Co., Ltd, Beijing 100007, China
Abstract:As an independent chapter for the first time, international cooperation on mitigation is assessed comprehensively in the Fifth Assessment Report of IPCC. The major conclusions include: United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is the main multilateral forum, however, the basic principle of UNFCCC should be evolved as pattern of development, emission and impacts change, and the Kyoto Protocol together with CDM has not been as successful as intended; international cooperation on climate change has become more institutionally diverse over the past decade, varying in the degree to which their authority is centralized; the lessons from existing agreements are participation and compliance. A “bottom-up” mechanism and finance/technology incentives encourage broad participation, so does trade measures, which can also be used to enhance compliance. Through policy linkage, the diversified mechanisms outside UNFCCC can complement a binding international agreement on climate change. The assessment has significant impacts on international cooperation after 2020.
Keywords:climate change mitigation  international cooperation  IPCC AR5  WGⅢ
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《气候变化研究进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《气候变化研究进展》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号