首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Effects of Spatiotemporal Constraints on Geostatistical Analysis of Groundwater Depth
Authors:Amit Hellman  Gilboa Pe'er  Maribeth L Kniffin  Ronnie Kamai
Institution:1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel;2. Nuclear Research Center Negev, Beersheba, Israel;3. Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA;4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
Abstract:Geostatistical evaluation of the groundwater depth (GWD) in California's South Coast hydrologic region, and its sensitivity to different spatiotemporal assumptions, is presented in this paper. We obtain a pseudo-stationary representation of the groundwater depth, using the publicly available, online database from the GAMA GeoTracker project, while tracking the associated uncertainty throughout the process. We create nine different sub-datasets, using different temporal constraints, such as seasonal partitioning and different long-term variability filtering criteria. The geostatistical analysis and comparison between the different maps highlight the trade-off between spatial and temporal accuracy. For example, when moving to stricter filtering criteria, despite removing a large number of sites from the interpolation, the root mean squared error (RMSE) calculated in the analysis either decreased or only slightly increased. This suggests that the long-term variability filter is a good representation of the GWD accuracy and that the cross-validation RMSE captures both the stability effect as well as spatial density of the measurement points. We further find that the point-specific standard error is strongly correlated with the associated GWD prediction and that the mean relative error is approximately 60% of the prediction. Hence, it is highly recommended to account for such error in a forward-engineering application, by introducing a GWD distribution rather than a single value into the analysis. Finally, we analyze seasonal fluctuations in the study region and find that they are on average 2.5 m with a standard deviation of 8 m.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号