首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

CAWS型自动站与人工观测风速记录的对比分析
引用本文:尹宪志,郭爱民,卢会云. CAWS型自动站与人工观测风速记录的对比分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2006, 24(1): 57-59
作者姓名:尹宪志  郭爱民  卢会云
作者单位:中国气象局兰州干旱气象研究所,甘肃省干旱气候变化与减灾重点实验室,甘肃,兰州,730020;兰州中心气象台,甘肃,兰州,730020;平凉市气象局,甘肃,平凉,744000
摘    要:利用平凉气象观测站2003年1~12月人工站和自动站平行观测的风速、风向资料,统计比较了2003年1~12月人工站与自动站风速观测值和极值,结果表明:受观测仪器系统偏差和观测取值时间差异的影响,人工站比自动站的日平均风速偏小0.4 m/s。风向完全相符的接近40%,2个以上方位的不相符率4%。

关 键 词:气象站  自动站  风速  对比分析
文章编号:1006-7639(2006)-01-0057-03
收稿时间:2005-07-07
修稿时间:2005-07-072005-10-25

Comparison Analysis of Wind Speed Records in Routine and CAWS Automatic Weather Station
YIN Xian-zhi,GUO Ai-min,LU Hui-yun. Comparison Analysis of Wind Speed Records in Routine and CAWS Automatic Weather Station[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2006, 24(1): 57-59
Authors:YIN Xian-zhi  GUO Ai-min  LU Hui-yun
Affiliation:1. Institute of Arid Meteorology, CMA, Key Laboratory of Climatic Changing and Reducing Disaster of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730020, China ;2. Lanzhou Central Meteorological Observatory, Lanzhou 730020, China; 3. Pingliang Meteorological Bureau of Gansu Porvince, Pingliang 744000,China
Abstract:Based on the wind speed and wind direction data observed in routine and automatic weather station in 2003 in Pingliang city,the statistical comparison of observed and extreme values in routine and automatic weather station from January to December in 2003 has been analyzed.The results show that in the influence of the systematic error of instruments and observational time error,the daily mean wind speed of routine station is 0.4 m/s less than automatic weather station,and the corresponding wind directions are nearly 40% in both routine and automatic weather stations,the ratio of disagreement over two directions is 4%.
Keywords:weather station  automatic weather station  wind speed  comparison analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号