首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Half a century of progress in research on terrestrial impact structures: A review
Institution:1. Bern University of Applied Sciences, Laenggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland;2. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria;3. Cardno, P.O. Box 1236, Oxford 38655, MS, United States;4. School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, Scotland, United Kingdom;5. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand;1. Institute of Geography, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln, Germany;2. Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, RWTH Aachen, Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 17, 52056 Aachen, Germany;1. Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4556, Australia;2. Department of International Environmental and Agriculture Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Saiwai 3-5-8, Fuchu, Tokyo 1585809, Japan;3. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Facultad de Minas, Office M2-312, Carrera 80 No 65-223, Núcleo Robledo, Medellín, Colombia;1. Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic;2. Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, V Hole?ovi?kách 41, Prague 8 182 09, Czech Republic
Abstract:The author, who investigated the Wolfe Creek, Australia, in 1962 and edited two Benchmark Sets of Readings on Meteorite Craters and possible Astroblemes in 1977 and 1979, reviews the state of knowledge at the present time. The text is concerned with terrestrial impact structures, geological features, without any consideration of extraterrestrial analogues. A handful of definitive publications are drawn on to present the story of terrestrial impact in a single article. The text covers historical aspects (briefly); the effect of target variations; the paucity of human observation of such large-scale events; distinction from volcanic (endogenous) structures; modification by geological processes; the transience of the crater initially formed on the target, and its subsequent modifications; the global geographic distribution of the 174 structures now listed (of which a number are dubious attributions); their distribution in geological time (many ages being known only known to wide limits, maximum or minimum values); their size distribution; calculations of impact frequencies; shock effects; processes on impact; the stages of formation; impact into shallow marine and deep sea targets; impacts on ice (about which little is known); and finally the input of impact into biotic extinctions. In this last lengthy section, the summaries of the conclusions of scientists researching impact on Earth and palaeontologists researching biotic impact are set side by side. It is concluded that, if the recent foraminiferal evidence obtained by Gerta Keller and associates is taken at its face value, the case of impact as a sole agent in extinction is non-existent: biotic extinction is clearly a complex process involving a number of causes, in some cases it was staggered in time, and different sets of organisms responded quite differently and surprisingly, even in the same extinction event. Extraterrestrial impact may have been one of the causes in some cases, but it may have been regional rather than global in its effects. We may never know how much input it had into the record of biotic extinction on Earth? An enormous amount of new knowledge has arisen from detailed studies of this new family of remarkable geological structures.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号