首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers
Institution:1. The Swire Institute of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Cape d’Aguilar Road, Shek O, Hong Kong, PR China;2. Division of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, PR China;3. Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China;1. Ifremer, Laboratoire d’Écotoxicologie, rue de l’île d’Yeu, BP 21105, F-44311, Nantes Cedex 03, France;2. Université de Nantes, UFR Sciences et Techniques, 2, rue de la Houssinière, BP 92208, 44322, Nantes Cedex 03, France;3. LABOCEA, Unité R&D, 120 Avenue de Rochon, 29280, Plouzané, France;4. Université de Bordeaux, UMR 5805, EPOC, Laboratoire de Physico Toxico Chimie de l''environnement, 351 Cours de la Libération, CS 10004, F-33405, Talence Cedex, France;5. CNRS, UMR 5805, EPOC, Laboratoire de Physico Toxico Chimie de l''environnement, 351 Cours de la Libération, CS 10004, F-33405, Talence Cedex, France;6. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark;1. School of Environmental Science & Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 500-712, Republic of Korea;2. Marine Environment Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Busan 619-705, Republic of Korea;3. Aquaculture Management Division, NFRDI, Busan 619-705, Republic of Korea;1. Department of Oceanography, Pusan National University, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University, 45, Yongso-ro, Namgu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea;3. National Institute of Fisheries Science, Korea, Busan 46083, Republic of Korea;1. Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030, China;2. Ministry of Education Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030, China;3. College of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China;4. Department of Traumatology, BG Trauma Center, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany;1. Trondheim Biological Station, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway;2. SINTEF Ocean, Environmental and Marine Resources, 7465 Trondheim, Norway;3. Centre of Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems (AMOS), NTNU, Trondheim, Norway;4. Department of Marine Technology, NTNU, Norway;5. University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), Longyearbyen, Norway;6. Underwater Systems and Technology Laboratory, University of Porto, Portugal;7. Department of Engineering Cybernetics, NTNU, Norway
Abstract:Irgarol 1051 (2-methythiol-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine) is an algaecide commonly used in antifouling paints. It undergoes photodegradation which yields M1 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) as its major and most stable degradant. Elevated levels of both Irgarol and M1 have been detected in coastal waters worldwide; however, ecotoxicity effects of M1 to various marine autotrophs such as cyanobacteria are still largely unknown. This study firstly examined and compared the 96 h toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to the cyanobacterium Chroococcus minor and two marine diatom species, Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Our results suggested that Irgarol was consistently more toxic to all of the three species than M1 (96 h EC50 values: C. minor, 7.71 μg L−1 Irgarol vs. >200 μg L−1 M1; S. costatum, 0.29 μg L−1 Irgarol vs. 11.32 μg L−1 M1; and T. pseudonana, 0.41 μg L−1 Irgarol vs. 16.50 μg L−1 M1). Secondly, we conducted a meta-analysis of currently available data on toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to both freshwater and marine primary producers based on species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Interestingly, freshwater autotrophs are more sensitive to Irgarol than their marine counterparts. For marine autotrophs, microalgae are generally more sensitive to Irgarol than macroalgae and cyanobacteria. With very limited available data on M1 (i.e. five species), M1 might be less toxic than Irgarol; nonetheless this finding warrants further confirmation with additional data on other autotrophic species.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号