首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

典型北斗低成本导航型与测量型终端定位性能初步对比分析
引用本文:王 强,袁一歌,马建峰,汪 亮. 典型北斗低成本导航型与测量型终端定位性能初步对比分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2020, 40(4): 381-365
作者姓名:王 强  袁一歌  马建峰  汪 亮
摘    要:基于不同类型北斗终端的共天线零基线实测数据,从伪距标准单点定位、单频伪距相对定位以及单历元单频载波相位相对定位等方面,比较一款典型低成本导航型北斗终端与一款典型高性能测量型北斗终端的定位性能差异。结果表明,导航型北斗终端相比于测量型终端,其伪距单点定位和伪距相对定位的精度稍差,但载波相位相对定位精度差距十分明显,无法实现cm级的定位。

关 键 词:BDS  低成本导航型终端  测量型终端  定位性能评估  定位性能对比  

Preliminary Assessment and Comparison of Positioning Performance between Typical Low-Cost Navigational and Geodetic BDS Terminals
WANG Qiang,YUAN Yige,MA Jianfeng,WANG Liang. Preliminary Assessment and Comparison of Positioning Performance between Typical Low-Cost Navigational and Geodetic BDS Terminals[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2020, 40(4): 381-365
Authors:WANG Qiang  YUAN Yige  MA Jianfeng  WANG Liang
Abstract:In this work, we compare the BDS positioning performance of a typical low-cost navigational-type terminal with a typical high-performance geodetic terminal, based on the zero-baseline data. The comparisons are carried out by pseudorange-based single point positioning, pseudorange-based single-frequency relative positioning, and carrier phase-based single-epoch single-frequency relative positioning. The results show that the positioning accuracies of the pseudorange-based single point positioning and relative positioning for the Beidou low-cost navigational terminal are slightly lower than that of the geodetic terminal, and the difference of the carrier phase-based relative positioning performances between the geodetic and navigational terminals are very significant since the centimeter-level positioning result cannot be achieved by the navigational terminal.
Keywords: BDS  low-cost navigational terminal  geodetic terminal  positioning performance evaluation  positioning performance comparison  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号