首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同对流层天顶延迟模型在陕西地区的精度及适用性分析
引用本文:尹恒毅,郭春喜,姚顽强,赵 红,黄功文,王 维,惠 哲. 不同对流层天顶延迟模型在陕西地区的精度及适用性分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2020, 40(4): 391-394
作者姓名:尹恒毅  郭春喜  姚顽强  赵 红  黄功文  王 维  惠 哲
作者单位:西安科技大学测绘科学与技术学院;国家自然资源部大地测量数据处理中心
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41904040,41774004,41574003,41474015,41604001);国家科技部科技基础性工作专项(2015FY210400);国家基础测绘科技项目(2018KJ0205);陕西测绘地理信息局科技创新项目(2018-4)。
摘    要:利用MATLAB实现UNB3m、GPT2w+Hopfield、GPT2w+Saastamoinen、GPT3+Hopfield、GPT3+Saastamoinen等5种模型,分析它们在陕西地区的适用性。结果表明,5种模型结果普遍偏小。GPT2w+Saastamoinen和GPT3+Saastamoinen模型整体精度相当,且优于其他3种模型,bias为1.41cm,RMS分别为4.68cm和4.67cm,且随着高程增加精度越来越高。5种策略精度均随季节变化而变化,其中UNB3m变化最为明显,夏冬2季bias差达到7.92cm,RMS差达到7.67cm。更高精度计算时,秋季应使用GPT3,而春夏2季时使用GPT2w效果更好。选用同样的气象参数模型时,Saastamoinen模型比Hopfield模型更适用于陕西地区,并且陕北地区精度最好。对比最新的全球气压温度模型GPT3与GPT2w发现,2种模型算得的地面气压P、地面温度T、地面水汽压e、大气加权平均温度Tm等4种气象参数均相差细微,所以在陕西地区利用GPT2w或GPT3分别算得的对流层总延迟ZTD和对流层干延迟ZHD相差很小,通过对流层湿延迟ZWD算得的PWV也几乎相当。

关 键 词:GNSS  全球气压温度模型  对流层延迟模型  陕西地区

Accuracy and Applicability of Different Tropospheric Zenith Delay Models in Shaanxi Province
YIN Hengyi,GUO Chunxi,YAO Wanqiang,ZHAO Hong,HUANG Gongwen,WANG Wei,HUI Zhe. Accuracy and Applicability of Different Tropospheric Zenith Delay Models in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2020, 40(4): 391-394
Authors:YIN Hengyi  GUO Chunxi  YAO Wanqiang  ZHAO Hong  HUANG Gongwen  WANG Wei  HUI Zhe
Affiliation:(College of Geomatics,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,58 Mid-Yanta Road,Xi’an 710054,China;Geodetic Data Processing Centre of Ministry of Natural Resources,334 East-Youyi Road,Xi’an 710054,China)
Abstract:In this paper, we use MATLAB to realize five models of UNB3m, GPT2w+Hopfield, GPT2w+Saastamoinen, GPT3+Hopfield, GPT3+Saastamoinen. We analyze their applicability in Shaanxi. The results show that the model calculation results are generally small in Shaanxi province. The overall accuracy of the GPT2w+Saastamoinen and GPT3+Saastamoinen models is comparable and superior to the other three models, with bias of 1.41 cm and RMS of 4.68 cm and 4.67 cm respectively; the precision improves as elevation increases. The accuracy of the five models varies with the seasons; UNB3m has the most significant change. The bias difference in summer and winter is 7.92 cm, and the RMS difference is 7.67 cm. For higher precision calculation, GPT3 should be used in autumn, while GPT2w works better in spring and summer. When using the same meteorological parameter model, the Saastamoinen model is more suitable for Shaanxi than the Hopfield model, and northern Shaanxi has the best longitude. In the comparison between two latest models GPT3 and GPT2w, we find that the four meteorological parameters calculated by the two models are slightly different, including surface air pressure, surface temperature, surface water pressure and weighted average air temperature. The difference between the total tropospheric delay ZTD and the tropospheric dry delay ZHD calculated by GPT3 or GPT3 is small, and the PWV calculated by the tropospheric wet delay ZWD is almost the same.
Keywords:GNSS  global pressure temperature model  tropospheric delay model  Shaanxi region  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号