Decoding post-orogenic sediment recycling and dispersal using detrital zircon core and rim ages |
| |
Authors: | Li Liu Jie Xu Daniel F. Stockli Timothy F. Lawton Ronald C. Blakey |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China;2. School of Ocean Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China;3. Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA;4. Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA;5. Colorado Plateau Geosystems/Deep Time Maps, Phoenix, Arizona, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Detrital zircon (DZ) geochronology has become a popular tool in provenance studies during the past two decades. However, similar zircon crystallization ages from different source regions greatly hamper the interpretation of sediment dispersal and recycling processes. The Alleghenian–Ouachita–Marathon (AOM) foreland and vicinity in North America is a region where some dominant DZ age groups could come from both the southern Appalachians in the eastern United States and the Gondwanan terranes in Mexico. In this study, we present 1045 new DZ U–Pb ages and 81 DZ core–rim age pairs in lower Permian sandstone in the Permian Basin and Miocene sandstone in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (GOM). These new data were integrated with published DZ single U–Pb age and core–rim ages from syn- to post-orogenic strata in the Permian Basin, Marathon foldbelt, southern Appalachian foreland basin and eastern GOM to interpret the sediment-dispersal models in the AOM foreland and eastern GOM. Our models show that during the Leonardian Stage, sediments derived from the Appalachians were first delivered to the US midcontinent and then recycled to the Permian Basin; during the Miocene, sediment from the Appalachians fluxed to the eastern GOM, with no longshore mixing from the western GOM. These models based on the integration of single U–Pb and core–rim ages are consistent with published results that used other methods, including zircon single U–Pb age, zircon Hf isotopic data, zircon (U–Th)/He age, sedimentology and stratigraphy. Our results demonstrate that although some limitations exist, zircon core–rim age is a powerful tool, adding an extra constraint on the interpretation of sediment-dispersal systems. This tool is particularly applicable to the post-orogenic stage, during which the sediment pathways are more complicated because of the dominant input from distal sources. Insights gained in this study imply that this novel strategy of using core and rim ages could be integrated with other methods to better understand sediment dispersal. |
| |
Keywords: | core and rim depth profiling detrital zircon sediment dispersal sediment recycling |
|
|