| 不同方式的纳潮量计算比较——以胶州湾2006年秋季小潮为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈红霞,华锋,刘娜,吴志彦.不同方式的纳潮量计算比较——以胶州湾2006年秋季小潮为例[J].海洋科学进展,2009,27(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈红霞 华锋 刘娜 吴志彦 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 国家海洋局第一海洋研究所,山东,青岛,266061;海洋环境科学和数值模拟国家海洋局重点实验室,山东,青岛,266061
2. 威海市气象局,山东,威海,264200 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 青岛市海洋与渔业局项目，国家自然科学基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以胶州湾为例,分别通过纳潮量常用算法和走航ADCP直接测流资料计算了2006年秋季小湖期间3个不同潮对段的纳湖量.结果表明,根据纳潮量常用算法得到的纳潮量变化范围大干采用测流资料计算得到的纳潮量范围.在平均意义上,两种算法的平均值分别为6.303×108m3和6.480×108m3,仅相差O.177×108m3.这既验证了通过海流计算纳潮量的精确性,也体现了通过纳潮量算法计算纳潮量在平均意义上的有效性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 胶州湾 纳潮量 走航ADCP |
Comparison Among Di fferent Methods for Tidal Prism Calculation——Neap Tide of Jiaozhou Bay in Autumn 2006 as an Expounded Example |
| |
| CHEN Hong-xia,HUA Feng,LIU Na,WU Zhi-yan.Comparison Among Di fferent Methods for Tidal Prism Calculation——Neap Tide of Jiaozhou Bay in Autumn 2006 as an Expounded Example[J].Advances in Marine Science,2009,27(1). |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Hong-xia HUA Feng LIU Na WU Zhi-yan |
| |
| Institution: | 1. First Institute of Oceanography;SOA;Qingdao 266061;China;2. Key Lab of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling;3. Weihai Meteorology Bureau;Weihai 264200;China |
| |
| Abstract: | Jiaozhou Bay is taken as an example to expound the tidal prism calculation, and the tidal prism estimated from the cruising ADCP data obtained respectively during 3 pieces of time intervals in the neap tide of autumn 2006 are used to compare with the result from the common algorithm. The results show that the tidal prisms estimated by means of the common algorithm varies in a greater range of the quantitutive value than that estimated by use of the observational current data. On an average, the mean prisms ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Jiaozhou Bay tidal prism cruising ADCP |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
