Experiences numeriques sur des billards C1 formes de quatre arcs de cercles

The paper deals with some properties of the dynamical system with two degrees of freedom defined by the motion of a particle in a certain type of billiard. These properties are studied by means of numerical experiments. Most results are represented in the now classical surface of section. One parameter families of billiards with a C¹ boundary constructed with four arcs of circles are defined; we use the property that the four meeting points of such billiards lie on the same circle. These billiards may be convex or non convex. They generalize the ‘oval’ billiard with two axes of symmetry studied by Benettin and Strelcyn. We call them generalized billiards. We find the following results:

1. The periodic orbit along the small diameter of a billiard is stable or unstable in the linear approximation according to the position of the center of each relevant are with respect to the opposite one. This orbit is always stable if the billiard is symmetric with respect to its large diameter.
2. When the center of an arc lies on the opposite arc two different transition patterns from order to chaos are observed for the same billiard. If the billiard is of the Benettin and Strelcyn type three distinct nested chaotic seas are seen two of which are separated by a pseudo-invariant curve generated by a so called cancellation orbit.
3. The total area of non chaotic regions is greater for symmetric billiards.
4. Peanut shaped billiards always look ergodic. It can happen also that strictly convex asymmetric billiards look ergodic. This is important since no strictly convex billiard is known for which ergodicity has been proven. The conjecture is proposed that a generalized billiard with neither 2-periodic nor 4-periodic stable orbit in the linear approximation is ergodic.
5. Transverse invariant curves such as the one found by Hénon and Wisdom seem common for billiards with two axes of symmetry but probably do not exist for asymmetric billiards.

There are therefore several properties which differentiate symmetric billiards from asymmetric ones. We conclude by emphasizing that C¹ generalized billiards are indeed inadequate models for smooth mappings in general.