首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

东喜马拉雅构造结泥质高压麻粒岩的锆石和独居石定年与地质意义
引用本文:芦维瑞,张泽明,李文坛,安文涛,任宏飞,郭明明,王迪,吴双鹏. 东喜马拉雅构造结泥质高压麻粒岩的锆石和独居石定年与地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(11): 3413-3434
作者姓名:芦维瑞  张泽明  李文坛  安文涛  任宏飞  郭明明  王迪  吴双鹏
作者单位:中国地质大学地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083;中国地质大学地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083;中国地质科学院地质研究所, 北京 100037
基金项目:本文受国家自然科学基金项目(41941016-2、91855210)、中国地质科学院地质研究所基本科研业务费(J2006)和中国地质调查局项目(DD20190059)联合资助.
摘    要:东喜马拉雅构造结的南迦巴瓦杂岩含有广泛分布的高压麻粒岩,但由于以前获得了许多不同的年龄,对这些麻粒岩的变质与深熔时代、持续时间和成因存在不同认识。本文对泥质高压麻粒岩(蓝晶石榴黑云片岩)中的锆石和独居石进行了系统的内部结构、U-(Th)-Pb定年和微量元素分析,以求揭示这些岩石是否具有相同的演化过程。所研究的6个蓝晶石榴黑云片岩由石榴石、蓝晶石、黑云母、石英、钾长石、斜长石、夕线石、白云母、石墨和副矿物金红石、钛铁矿、锆石和独居石组成,峰期矿物组合是石榴石+蓝晶石+斜长石+钾长石+黑云母+石英+金红石。6个样品中的锆石均由继承碎屑核+变质(深熔)幔+变质(深熔)边组成。其中3个样品中的锆石幔和边较宽,均可进行原位定年,幔部给出了类似的较老年龄范围(39.6~31.6Ma、40.8~32.0Ma和38.1~31.3Ma),而边部给出了类似的较年轻年龄范围(26.8~17.3Ma、28.3~18.6Ma和28.4~18.8Ma)。另外3个样品的锆石幔部较窄,不能进行分析,其边部给出了与前3个样品锆石边部类似的年轻年龄范围(22.0~17.0Ma、20.9~16.9Ma和22.2~16.6Ma)。一个片岩样品中的独居石给出了与其锆石幔部+边部年龄类似的较宽年龄范围(38.1~17.5Ma),而另外3个样品中的独居石获得了与其锆石边部年龄相似的年轻年龄范围(26.0~18.8Ma、22.3~16.9Ma和26.4~19.4Ma)。随着年龄的减小,锆石和独居石的Th/U比值增大,Eu/Eu*减小,独居石的HREE和Y含量减小。基于这些分析结果,笔者认为所研究的6个片岩记录了相同的、从~41Ma持续到~17Ma的进变质与深熔过程。但是,由于某些样品中的锆石和独居石在早期变质和深熔过程中形成的结晶域(锆石幔部)很窄,无法定年,导致不同的样品获得了不同的年龄范围。结合现有研究成果,笔者推测南迦巴瓦杂岩中的高压麻粒岩经历了相似的长期进变质与深熔过程。

关 键 词:东喜马拉雅构造结  高压麻粒岩  锆石  独居石  地质年代学
收稿时间:2021-08-10
修稿时间:2021-10-28

Zircon and monazite dating of pelitic high-pressure granulite in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis and geological significance
LU WeiRui,ZHANG ZeMing,LI WenTan,AN WenTao,REN HongFei,GUO MingMing,WANG Di,WU ShuangPeng. Zircon and monazite dating of pelitic high-pressure granulite in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis and geological significance[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2021, 37(11): 3413-3434
Authors:LU WeiRui  ZHANG ZeMing  LI WenTan  AN WenTao  REN HongFei  GUO MingMing  WANG Di  WU ShuangPeng
Affiliation:School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geoscience, Beijing 100083, China;School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geoscience, Beijing 100083, China;Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
Abstract:The Namche Barwa complex in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis contains widely distributed high-pressure granulites. However, due to many different ages previously obtained, there are different understandings on the metamorphic and anatectic age, duration and genesis of these granulites. In this paper, zircon and monazite in high-pressure pelitic granulite (kyanite garnet biotite schist) samples are systematically analyzed by internal structure, U-(Th)-Pb isotope and trace element, in order to reveal whether these rocks have the same evolution process. The six schists studied are composed of garnet, kyanite, biotite, K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, sillimanite, muscovite, graphite and accessory minerals rutile, ilmenite, zircon and monazite. The peak mineral assemblages are garnet+kyanite+plagioclase+K-feldspar+biotite+quartz+rutile. The zircons in the six samples are composed of inherited detrital core+metamorphic (anatectic) mantle+metamorphic (anatectic) rim. The zircon mantle and rim in three samples are sufficiently wide and can be dated in situ. The zircon mantles give a similar older age range of 39.6~31.6Ma, 40.8~32.0Ma and 38.1~31.3Ma, respectively, while the rims give similar younger age ranges of 26.8~17.3Ma, 28.3~18.6Ma and 28.4~18.8Ma, respectively. The zircon mantles of the other three samples are narrow and cannot be analyzed, while the zircon rims give young age ranges of 22.0~17.0Ma, 20.9~16.9Ma and 22.2~16.6Ma, respectively. Monazite in one schist sample gives a wide age range of 38.1~17.5Ma, which is similar to that obtained by zircon mantle+rim from the same sample. Monazite in the other three samples obtains young age ranges of 26.0~18.8Ma, 22.3~16.9Ma and 26.4~19.4Ma, respectively, which are similar to those given by the zircon rims from the same samples. With the decrease of age, Th/U ratio of zircon and monazite increases, Eu/Eu* of zircon and monazite decreases, HREE and Y of monazite decrease. Based on these analytical results, we suggest that the six schists recorded the same and long-lasting prograde metamorphic and anatectic process from ca.41Ma to ca.17Ma. However, the domains of zircon and monazite in some samples formed during early metamorphism and anatexis are too narrow to date via the in-situ analysis method adopted by this study. Combined with the existing research results, we speculate that the high-pressure granulites in the Namche Barwa complex have experienced similar prolonged prograde metamorphism and anatexis.
Keywords:Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis  High-pressure granulites  Zircon  Monazite  Geochronology
点击此处可从《岩石学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩石学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号