首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Institutional quality and catch performance of fishing nations
Institution:1. Oregon State University, 400A Bexell Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States;2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 0843-03092, Panama, Panama;1. Ecología Funcional de Sistemas Acuáticos, Centro Universitario Regional del Este, Universidad de la República, Ruta nacional n° 15, km 28.5, CP 27000, Rocha, Uruguay;2. Sección Oceanografía y Ecología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, CP 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay;3. Laboratorio de Físicoquímica Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, CP 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay;1. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (PUCV), Valparaíso, Chile;2. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;3. Instituto de Ciencias del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain;1. National Institute of Labour Economics Research and Development and Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi 110007, India;2. Delhi School of Economics, Delhi 110007, India
Abstract:The relationship between annual growth in the catches of fishing nations and the quality of the institutions of those nations is analysed. Catch volumes are used as a proxy for development, since economic performance indicators based on a common set of definitions do not exist. 49 major fishing nations were selected for this study, including 22 OECD countries and several developing countries. Three general good governance indices, for government-efficiency (World Bank), corruption (Transparency International) and competitiveness (World Economic Forum) and one fishery specific FAO Code of Conduct compliance index were used. The correlation between fisheries' performance and the indices proved to be spurious, but OECD members achieved a statistically significant negative growth in catches between 1987 and 2007. The countries are divided into five groups, including ‘Winners' and ‘Losers', with reference to catch growth rates over two decades. Most of the OECD countries fell into the category ‘Losers', whereas “Winners” includes many developing countries with lower quality institutions. Some countries had experienced an amazing growth in catches, while others had experienced a decline. The future prospects for both categories are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号