首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Green growth rhetoric versus reality: Insights from Indonesia
Institution:1. Caroline Amalie Vej 78, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark;2. Viikki Tropical Resources Institute (VITRI), University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 27, (Latokartanonkaari 7), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland;3. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Jalan CIFOR, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor (Barat) 16115, Indonesia;4. University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 25, 1258 Frederiksberg, Denmark;1. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, Dresden University of Technology, Germany;2. Forests and Governance Programme, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia;3. Global Green Growth Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia;4. Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen UR, The Netherlands;1. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA;2. Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul 130-712, Republic of Korea;3. School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA;4. Forestry Study Program, University of Mataram, Indonesia;5. Faculty of Economics, University of Mataram, Indonesia;6. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor Barat 16115, Indonesia
Abstract:By 2030 Indonesia aims to reduce its CO2 emissions by 29% while maintaining a 7% annual GDP growth rate, thus making “green economy” a reality. Based on a review of literature and secondary data and interviews with key informants, this article examines the gap between these national ambitions and the reality on the ground, with particular attention to the challenges of multi-scalar environmental governance. It first introduces the green economy concept and discusses the main green growth policies and initiatives at the national level. The article then examines green growth ambitions at the provincial level in East Kalimantan province. Our findings suggest that existing plans to further expand oil palm plantations are at odds with provincial efforts to reduce emissions. This highlights a key paradox we identify at the heart of the green economy concept as it is developing in Indonesia: between a development trajectory based on resource extraction and agro-industrial development, and ‘green’ aspirations linked to environmental protection and greenhouse gas emissions reductions. We conclude that the main challenges to address these contradictions are related to the lack of coordination between different governance scales and a political economy that is not conducive to reforms in the land-based sector. There is a need to align investment, planning, and green growth policies, based on a strong political commitment and an awareness of social and environmental trade-offs. On a more general level the article shows that the green economy concept refers to a form of environmental governance in which authorities and interests may overlap and come into conflict at different scales. Hence, differing priorities may lead the material expression of the green economy to diverge significantly from policy as it is initially laid out.
Keywords:Green growth  Green economy  Oil palm  REDD+  Environmental Governance  East Kalimantan
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号