首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种桩型受荷性能对比现场试验研究
引用本文:郭连盛, 高彦斌. 2008: 两种桩型受荷性能对比现场试验研究. 工程地质学报, 16(S1): 391-394.
作者姓名:郭连盛  高彦斌
作者单位:1.上海济智岩土科技有限公司 上海 200092;;2.同济大学地下建筑与工程系 上海 200092
摘    要:通过对具有相同直径和长度的PHC预应力管桩和混凝土钻孔灌注桩的单桩竖向抗压静载荷试验及单桩水平静载荷试验,分析两种桩型在竖向受荷和水平受荷下情况下的桩顶变形以及承载能力。研究结果表明,两种不同桩型的竖向受荷性能差别不大,PHC管桩的竖向承载力要略大于灌注桩;PHC管桩的水平向承载力与灌注桩几乎相同,但水平向位移要略小于灌注桩的位移,由此计算得到的地基水平向抗力比例系数m也就略大于灌注桩的m值。

关 键 词:钻孔灌注桩  PHC预应力管桩  静载荷试验

COMPARISON OF BEARING PERFORMANCE OF TWO TYPES OF PILES BY FIELD LOAD TESTS
GUO Liansheng, GAO Yanbin. 2008: COMPARISON OF BEARING PERFORMANCE OF TWO TYPES OF PILES BY FIELD LOAD TESTS. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 16(S1): 391-394.
Authors:GUO Liansheng  GAO Yanbin
Affiliation:1.Shanghai JIZHI Geotechnical Engineering LTD.Shanghai 200092;;2.Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092
Abstract:Through single pile vertical resistant to vertical static load experiment and single pile horizontal static load experiment on PHC pre-pressed pipe pile and bored pile with the same diameter and length, this paper analyzed pile head deformation and bearing performance of the two kinds of piles under the circumstances of vertical load and horizontal load. The results indicate that, the vertical load bearing performance differs little between the two piles. PHC pre-pressed pipe pile has a little more vertical bearing capacity than bored pile, while it has nearly the same horizontal bearing capacity with bored pile, with a little less horizontal deformation. Hence the level resistance coefficient ratio of foundation m calculated from PHC pre-pressed pipe pile is a little higher than bored pile.
Keywords:Bored pile  PHC pre-pressed pipe pile  Static load test
点击此处可从《工程地质学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《工程地质学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号