首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


U‐Pb Detrital Zircon Analysis – Results of an Inter‐laboratory Comparison
Authors:Jan Ko?ler  Ji?í Sláma  Elena Belousova  Fernando Corfu  George E Gehrels  Axel Gerdes  Matthew S A Horstwood  Keith N Sircombe  Paul J Sylvester  Massimo Tiepolo  Martin J Whitehouse  Jon D Woodhead
Institution:1. Centre for Geobiology and Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, , N‐5007 Bergen, Norway;2. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, CCFS/GEMOC, Macquarie University, , Sydney, New South Wales, 2109 Australia;3. Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, , N‐0316 Oslo, Norway;4. Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, , Tucson, AZ, 85721 USA;5. Institute of Geosciences, Goethe‐University Frankfurt, , D‐60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;6. NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, British Geological Survey, , Keyworth, NG12 5GG UK;7. Minerals and Natural Hazards Division, Geoscience Australia, , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601 Australia;8. Bruneau Centre for Research and Innovation and Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, , St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 5S7 Canada;9. CNR, Institute for Geosciences and Earth Resources, University of Pavia, , Pavia, 27100 Italy;10. Swedish Museum of Natural History, , SE‐10405 Stockholm, Sweden;11. School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, , Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 Australia
Abstract:Inter‐laboratory comparison of laser ablation ICP‐MS and SIMS U‐Pb dating of synthetic detrital zircon samples provides an insight into the state‐of‐the art of sedimentary provenance studies. Here, we report results obtained from ten laboratories that routinely perform this type of work. The achieved level of bias was mostly within ± 2% relative to the ID‐TIMS U‐Pb ages of zircons in the detrital sample, and the variation is likely to be attributed to variable Pb/U elemental fractionation due to zircon matrix differences between the samples and the reference materials used for standardisation. It has been determined that ~ 5% age difference between adjacent age peaks is currently at the limit of what can be routinely resolved by the in situ dating of detrital zircon samples. Precision of individual zircon age determination mostly reflects the data reduction and procedures of measurement uncertainty propagation, and it is largely independent of the instrumentation, analytical technique and reference samples used for standardisation. All laboratories showed a bias towards selection of larger zircon grains for analysis. The experiment confirms the previously published estimates of the minimum number of grains that have to be analysed in order to detect minor zircon age populations in detrital samples.
Keywords:detrital zircon  sedimentary provenance  U‐Pb dating  laser ablation ICP‐MS     SIMS     inter‐laboratory comparison  zircons dé  tritiques  provenance sé  dimentaire  datation U‐Pb  ablation laser ICP‐MS     SIMS     comparaison inter‐laboratoires
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号