首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Nine Fallacies of Floods
Authors:Roger A. Pielke Jr.
Affiliation:(1) Environmental and Societal Impacts Group, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.
Abstract:A number of important misconceptions or fallacies stand in the way of a better understanding of the nation's flood problem. The fallacies are not universal, with many flood experts, decision makers, and sectors of the public escaping their seductive logic. But enough people do fall prey to these fallacies of floods so as to create obstacles to improved utilization of the lessons of experience. This paper uses three of these lessons to organize presentation of the nine fallacies:We know the wrong things about the nature of the problem.Fallacy 1: Flood frequencies are well understood.Fallacy 2: Damaging flooding in recent years is unprecedented because of lsquoglobal warmingrsquo.Fallacy 3: Levees lsquopreventrsquo damages.Fallacy 4: Flood forecasts are universally available.We don't know enough about why and with what intensity we should act.Fallacy 5: Societal vulnerability to floods is well understood.Fallacy 6: Data on flood casualties is a proxy for flood risk.Fallacy 7: Data on flood damages is a proxy for flood risk.We know enough about what might be done. Fallacy 8: Knowledge leads to action.Fallacy 9: The U.S. flood problem can be addressed without Federal leadership and support.The purpose of raising the fallacies in this paper is to contribute to a systematic definition of the nation's flood problem.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号