首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

气象要素空间插值方法优化
引用本文:封志明,杨艳昭,丁晓强,林忠辉.气象要素空间插值方法优化[J].地理研究,2004,23(3):357-364.
作者姓名:封志明  杨艳昭  丁晓强  林忠辉
作者单位:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101
基金项目:中国科学院知识创新工程项目
摘    要:在区域水土平衡模型的研究中 ,空间插值可提供每个计算栅格的气象要素资料。本文运用反距离加权法 (IDW )和梯度距离反比法 (GIDW ) ,对 196 1~ 2 0 0 0年甘肃省及其周围85个气象站点的多年平均温度与降雨量进行了内插。交叉验证结果表明 :对于IDW和GIDW ,二者温度插值的平均绝对误差 (MAE)分别为 2 2 8℃和 0 73℃ ,平均相对误差(MRE)分别为 2 9 0 2 %和 9 4 1% ,降雨插值的MAE值依次为 5 5 2mm和 4 90mm ,MRE值分别为 19 4 3%和 17 80 % ,GIDW明显优于IDW。需要指出的是 :对于降雨 ,当其经纬度和海拔高程的复相关系数大于 0 80时 ,GIDW插值结果优于IDW ;否则相反

关 键 词:距离反比法  梯度距离反比法  降雨  温度  
文章编号:1000-0585(2004)03-0357-08
收稿时间:2003-06-28
修稿时间:2003年6月28日

Optimization of the spatial interpolation methods for climate resources
FENG Zhi ming,YANG Yan zhao,DING Xiao qiang,LIN Zhong hui.Optimization of the spatial interpolation methods for climate resources[J].Geographical Research,2004,23(3):357-364.
Authors:FENG Zhi ming  YANG Yan zhao  DING Xiao qiang  LIN Zhong hui
Institution:Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101,China
Abstract:As no single interpolation method is optimal for all regions and data, it is important to compare the results obtained using alternative methods applied to each data set In this study, two methods for spatial interpolation of climatic data from sparse weather station networks were compared Forty year monthly mean temperature and precipitation data from regions in Gansu province were interpolated using a deterministic estimation method termed "Inverse distance weighted" (IDS) and a statistical method termed "Gradient plus Inverse Distance Squared"(GIDS) By design, their power parameters were optimized on the basis of minimum root mean square error (RMSE) Corresponding cross validation tests show that optimal inverse distance had consistently better results than usual: As for temperature, the value of MAE decreases by 6 77% and 9 95% in the method of IDW and GIDW respectively; as for precipitation, the value of MAE decreases by 28 19% and 6 25% in the two methods correspondingly Summary statistics were used to determine if one method was significantly better than the other on the basis of mean absolute error (MAE), mean relative error (MRE) and root mean squared error(RMSE) Based on the mean absolute errors from cross validation tests, the methods were ranked GIDS>IDW for interpolating monthly precipitation and temperature, being average by 0 73℃ for monthly temperature and 4 90 mm for monthly precipitation Based on the mean relative errors from cross validation tests, the methods were also ranked GIDW>IDW for interpolating monthly precipitation and temperature, being averagely 9 02% for monthly temperature and 17 82% for monthly precipitation In addition, GIDW yields more accurate predictions than IDW when the correlation between rainfall and elevation is high (less than 0 80 in the case study) For Gansu province, except January and December, the remaining months in the year see the correlation between elevation and rainfall higher than 0 80,while these two months are not very important for us to study soil water balance, so we prefer GIDW method to our study Furthermore, before the interpolation of precipitation, we try to analyse the data, and the results show it is very important to analyse the character and distribution of data before interpolation In our study area, a cubic transformation improves the accuracy well
Keywords:Inverse distance weighted  Gradient plus Inverse-Distance-Squared  temperature  precipitation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号