首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Using geographically weighted regression to explore the spatially heterogeneous spread of bovine tuberculosis in England and Wales
Authors:Lucy?A.?Brunton  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:lucy.brunton@apha.gsi.gov.uk"   title="  lucy.brunton@apha.gsi.gov.uk"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Neil?Alexander,William?Wint,Adam?Ashton,Jennifer?M.?Broughan
Affiliation:1.Department of Epidemiological Sciences,Animal and Plant Health Agency,Addlestone,UK;2.Department of Zoology,Environment Research Group Oxford,Oxford,UK;3.Data Systems Group,Animal and Plant Health Agency,Addlestone,UK
Abstract:An understanding of the factors that affect the spread of endemic bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is critical for the development of measures to stop and reverse this spread. Analyses of spatial data need to account for the inherent spatial heterogeneity within the data, or else spatial autocorrelation can lead to an overestimate of the significance of variables. This study used three methods of analysis—least-squares linear regression with a spatial autocorrelation term, geographically weighted regression (GWR) and boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis—to identify the factors that influence the spread of endemic bTB at a local level in England and Wales. The linear regression and GWR methods demonstrated the importance of accounting for spatial differences in risk factors for bTB, and showed some consistency in the identification of certain factors related to flooding, disease history and the presence of multiple genotypes of bTB. This is the first attempt to explore the factors associated with the spread of endemic bTB in England and Wales using GWR. This technique improves on least-squares linear regression approaches by identifying regional differences in the factors associated with bTB spread. However, interpretation of these complex regional differences is difficult and the approach does not lend itself to predictive models which are likely to be of more value to policy makers. Methods such as BRT may be more suited to such a task. Here we have demonstrated that GWR and BRT can produce comparable outputs.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号