首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

碳封存项目井喷CO2扩散危险水平分级方法研究
引用本文:李 琦,石 晖,杨多兴.碳封存项目井喷CO2扩散危险水平分级方法研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(7):2070-2078.
作者姓名:李 琦  石 晖  杨多兴
作者单位:1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国地震局地壳应力研究所,北京 100085
基金项目:中国清洁发展机制基金赠款项目“二氧化碳捕获与封存技术的环境影响研究”(No. 2012087);环境保护部环境规划院科研计划专题任务“CCUS示范项目封存环境风险评估试点研究” 资助(No. 2015A111)。
摘    要:针对碳封存(CCS)项目井喷后的二氧化碳(CO2)气体泄漏扩散对附近居民的影响问题,提出将CO2井喷速率作为分级指标进行扩散危险水平分级。以内蒙古自治区鄂尔多斯市伊金霍洛旗地形、气候等条件为环境背景,以神华CCS示范项目为参考,运用CALPUFF高斯扩散模型模拟发生井喷事故,计算CO2气体扩散影响范围。根据扩散范围与井喷速率变化的相关关系,对CO2扩散危险水平进行分级。根据50 000 ppm浓度的最大扩散范围将CO2井喷扩散分为3个等级:Level 1、Level 2、Level 3,对应的井喷速率范围分别为0~2.5、2.5~10.0、10~20 m/s,对应扩散距离分别为0~130、130~180、180~420 m。通过与模拟场地周围环境条件和人群分布特点的交叉分析,当危险性等级为3级时,会威胁到泄漏井筒附近420 m范围内CCS场地内工作人员、散户居民以及附近公路上的过往行人的安全。该项危险水平分级研究工作有助于健全国家相关部门对CCS的监管,同时有利于推动CCS示范项目的健康发展。

关 键 词:二氧化碳地质封存  CO2气体泄漏  井喷  监测  风险评价  
收稿时间:2016-03-23

Classification of hazard levels of carbon dioxide dispersion under a well blowout in a CCS project
LI Qi,SHI Hui,YANG Duo-xing.Classification of hazard levels of carbon dioxide dispersion under a well blowout in a CCS project[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2016,37(7):2070-2078.
Authors:LI Qi  SHI Hui  YANG Duo-xing
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Institute of Crustal Dynamics, Chinese Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China
Abstract:A classification indicator is proposed and the hazard levels are classified for the carbon dioxide (CO2) dispersion when a well blowout is encountered at a CO2 capture and storage (CCS) site. Taken the topography and climate conditions of Yijinhuoluo Qi in Erdos city, Inner Mongolia, China, as the environmental background, the CALPUFF model is used to simulate a supposed well blowout with a reference import from the Shenhua CCS demonstration project. The dispersion distance of released gases is calculated, then the relationship between the dispersion distance and the blowout speed is chosen to classify the hazard levels of CO2 dispersion, and finally its influence is conducted. According to the maximum dispersion distance of the CO2 concentration in 50 000 ppm, the hazard levels of CO2 dispersion are classified into three levels by using an indicator of blowout speed. A well blowout with a release rate of CO2 between 0 and 2.5 m/s is identified as Level 1 corresponding to the dispersion distance of 0-130 m; a release rate of CO2 between 2.5 and 10 m/s is as Level 2, and the dispersion distance is 130-180 m; a release rate of CO2 between 10 and 20 m/s is as Level 3 with the dispersion distance of 180-420 m. According to the experimental research, it is shown that the persons around the leakage well within 420 m are affected when the hazard level reaches Level 3, which means the workers in the operational site, the residents around and the pedestrians passing on the nearby county road are all affected. Our research on the classification of hazard levels not only contributes to the supervision of relevant government agencies to the CCS projects but also is beneficial to the promotion of coming CCS demonstration projects in China.
Keywords:carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS)  CO2 leakage  well blowout  monitoring  risk assessment  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩土力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩土力学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号