2D magnetic resonance tomography applied to karstic conduit imaging |
| |
Authors: | J.-F. Girard M. Boucher A. Legchenko J.-M. Baltassat |
| |
Affiliation: | aBureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM), 3, avenue C. Guillemin, BP 6009, 45060, Orléans Cedex 2, France;bInstitut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orléans (ISTO), UMR6113 CNRS/Université d'Orléans, Bâtiment Géosciences, Rue de Saint Amand, BP 6759, 45067 Orléans Cedex 2, France;cInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), LTHE, BP53, 38041, GRENOBLE Cedex 9, France |
| |
Abstract: | Karstic conduits play a crucial role for water supply in many parts of the world. However, the imaging of such targets is generally a difficult task for most geophysical methods. Magnetic Resonance Sounding (MRS) is a geophysical method designed for imaging of water bearing structures. Initially, MRS was developed for characterizing horizontally stratified aquifers. However, when applying a 1D MRS measuring setup to the imaging of 2D–3D targets, the size of which may be much smaller than the loop, the accuracy and the lateral resolution may not be sufficient. We have studied the possibility of simultaneously processing several MRS aligned along a profile to perform a Magnetic Resonance Tomography (MRT). This work emphasizes the gain of resolution for 2D–3D imagery of MRT versus the interpolation of 1D inversion results of MRS along the same profile. Numerical modelling results show that the MRT response is sensitive to the size and location of the 2D target in the subsurface. Sensitivity studies reveal that by using the coincident transmitting/receiving (TX/RX) setup and shifting the loop around the anomaly area, the depth, section and position of a single karstic conduit with a size smaller than the MRS loop size can be resolved. The accuracy of the results depends on the noise level and signal level, the latter parameter being linked to the depth and volume of the karstic conduit and the water content in the limestone matrix. It was shown that when applying MRT to the localization of 2D anomalies such as karstic conduits, the inclination of the geomagnetic field, the orientation of the MRT profile and the angle of crossover of the conduit by the MRT profile must be taken into account. Otherwise additional errors in interpretation should be expected. A 2D inversion scheme was developed and tested. Both numerical and experimental results confirm the efficiency of the developed approach. |
| |
Keywords: | MRS MRT SNMR PMR Magnetic resonance sounding Magnetic resonance tomography Surface nuclear magnetic resonance Proton magnetic resonance Karstic conduit Groundwater |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|