A fundamental problem with the kinematic interpretation of geological structures |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Key Laboratory of Paleomagnetism and Tectonic Reconstruction of Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100081, China;2. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;3. Tianjin Municipal Water Conservancy Survey and Design Institute, Tianjin 300204, China;1. Departamento de Geología Regional, Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México, DF, Mexico;2. National Taiwan Normal University, Department of Earth Sciences, 88 Tingzhou Road Section 4, Taipei 11677, Taiwan;3. Department of Geology, St. Mary''s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3C3;4. Department of Energy, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3J9, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Non-steady flows are ubiquitous in nature. Not only do imposed boundary conditions vary with time and rock rheology change during the course of deformation but also deformation is generally heterogeneous and all of these conditions lead to non-steady flow histories.In modern kinematic analysis, flow apophyses, the instantaneous stretching axes and the vorticity vector, collectively referred to as the `eigen directions' of deformation, are used in place of Bruno Sander's kinematic axes. For deformation with a steady flow history, this practice is well justified and has led to great advances in structural geology. But for non-steady flow histories, the geometrical relationships among eigen directions (flow pattern) vary with time. This makes it inappropriate to correlate an association of structures and fabrics with certain `time-invariant' flow patterns and hence raises the question: How should we interpret geological structures and fabrics kinematically, without the assumption of homogeneous and steady deformation? We suggest that the answer lies primarily in forward-modeling of deformation, based on a knowledge of rock properties. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|