首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Intercomparison of Two Box Models of the Chemical Evolution in Biomass-Burning Smoke Plumes
Authors:Sherri A Mason  Jörg Trentmann  Tanja Winterrath  Robert J Yokelson  Theodore J Christian  Lisa J Carlson  Thomas R Warner  Louise C Wolfe  Meinrat O Andreae
Institution:(1) Department of Chemistry, State University of New York College at Fredonia, Fredonia, NY 14063, USA;(2) Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;(3) Biogeochemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, 55020, Germany;(4) Department of Chemistry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA;(5) Present address: Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany;(6) Present address: German Weather Service, Offenbach, Germany
Abstract:Results from two independently developed biomass-burning smoke plume models are compared. Model results were obtained for the temporal evolution of two nascent smoke plumes originating from significantly different fire environments (an Alaskan boreal forest and an African savanna). The two smoke plume models differed by 1%–10% for O3], with similar differences for NO x and formaldehyde (relative percent differences). Smaller intermodel differences were observed for the African savanna smoke plume as compared to the plume from the Alaskan boreal fire. Mechanistic differences between the models are heightened for the Alaskan smoke plume due to the higher VOC emission ratios as compared to the African savanna fire. The largest deviations result from the differences in oxidative photochemical mechanisms, with a smaller contribution attributable to the calculation of photolysis frequencies. The differences between the two smoke plume models are significantly smaller than the uncertainties of available photokinetic data or field measurements. Model accuracy depends most significantly on having the fullest possible VOC data, a requirement that is constrained by currently available instrumentation.
Keywords:biomass burning  computational modeling  intercomparison  tropospheric chemistry
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号