A method to evaluate the usability of interactive climate change impact decision aids |
| |
Authors: | Gabrielle Wong-Parodi Baruch Fischhoff Ben Strauss |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 129 Baker Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA 2. Departments of Engineering and Public Policy and Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, 219E Baker Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA 3. Climate Central, One Palmer Square, Suite 330, Princeton, NJ, 08542, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | Reducing the impacts from climate change requires people to make decisions that may prompt substantial changes in their lives. One possible way to help them is with personalized decision aids. Here we describe a method for evaluating such aids, in terms of how they affect users’ understanding of their situation, defined in terms of their (a) knowledge, (b) consistency of preferences, and (c) active mastery of the material. Our method provides a simple way to evaluate the usability of climate-change decision aids, and to address concerns that the choice of display could bias users’ attitudes. We demonstrate it with the Surging Seas Risk Finder, a decision aid focused on coastal flooding (http://sealevel.climatecentral.org/). |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|