Factors Requiring Resolution in Installing Vadose Zone Monitoring Systems

Increasingly, regulations by federal, state and local agencies are being developed that require the installation of vadose zone monitoring systems for hazardous chemical facilities in addition to, or in lieu of, conventional ground water monitoring wells. Compared to a ground water monitoring approach, vadose zone monitoring systems may permit earlier detection of chemical leakage and less costly cleanup of contamination. The effective use of vadose zone monitoring systems in detecting contamination depends on many factors. Without proper consideration of these factors, a vadose zone monitoring system may not give as high a level of reliability as a ground water monitoring system.
Major factors to consider in installing a vadose zone monitoring system are: type of instrument to use, number of instruments, depth and location of instruments, and frequency of monitoring. Means to evaluate these factors in a comprehensive fashion have been lacking. Based on recent experience in installing and operating vadose zone monitoring systems, criteria and methods useful in resolving the preceding factors have been developed. Types of instruments can be classified as either direct (lysimeter, vapor probe) or indirect (tensiometer, conductivity probe). A combination of the two is needed for reliability. The depth, location and number of instruments depend on the geometry of the facility, the number and size of likely contaminant leakage points in engineered barriers, properties of the material being monitored, the effective radius of monitoring for each instrument, vadose zone properties, and types of remedial actions that are available. The freqency of monitoring largely depends on the rate of movement of the contaminant. Evaluating the preceding factors requires some level of modeling and preliminary field testing.