|
|||||
|
|
RBCA Closure at DNAPL Sites |
|
| Authors: | Joseph W Sheahan CPG Roy O Ball PE Melinda W Hahn |
| Institution: | Joseph W. Sheahan;, CPG, is president of Ground Water Solutions Inc. (2500 Kerry St., Ste. 202, Lansing, MI 48912);phone: 346–5080;fax: 346–5179), and developer of Optimal Resource Allocation, an interactive, PC-based strategic planning and project management system. Sheahan is a hydrogeologist with 20 years experience in ground water quality issues and is a past president of the Michigan Section of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. Ground Water Solutions Inc. specializes in the facilitation and management of projects involving subsurface contamination. Other services include analysis and communication of ground water issues, peer review, and litigation support. Roy O. Ball;, P.E., Ph.D., received his B.S. in civil engineering from the University of Florida, his M.S. in environmental health engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and his Ph.D. in environmental engineering from the University of Delaware. He is a registered professional engineer in Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Dr. Ball is currently a principal of ENVIRON International Corp. (750 W. Lake Cook Rd., Ste. 420, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089;phone: 520–1155;fax: 520–9490) in Chicago. He has more than 25 years experience in environmental engineering and consulting, primarily for industry. Dr. Ball directs numerous RI/FS and remediation activities at Superfund, RCRA Corrective Action, and Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites. Melinda W. Hahn;, Ph.D., received her B.S. in physics and B.S. in mathematic from the University of Texas at Austin and her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from Johns Hopkins University. As an environmental consultant at ENVIRON International Corp. (1100 NASA Rd. 1, Ste. 410, Nassau Bay, TX 77058;phone: 335–8826;fax: 333–5308) in Houston, Dr. Hahn is involved in site investigation and characterization, data analysis, risk assessment, and the development of remedial alternatives. |
| Abstract: | The closure of sites with identified or suspected DNAPL (dense nonaqueous phase liquids) under the requirements of the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), or the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) has not been well defined. With respect to RCRA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has required that all contamination must be removed at closure such that no residual risk to human health or the environment remains. Therefore, even though many states administering the RCRA program have adopted or are considering Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) procedures (including the statistical methods described in SW-846) for RCRA closure, the treatment of DNAPL is, at best, challenging. The methodology for closure in CERCLA is described in "Risk Assessment Guidelines for Super-fund (RAGS)," which requires that risks above the National Contingency Plan criteria must be remediated, preferably by on-site or in situ destruction. Most risk-based Brownfield or voluntary cleanup programs do not provide any explicit allowance for DNAPL. However, while the ASTM methodology for RBCA in E1739-95 (ASTM 1995) does not explicitly treat the problem of DNAPL, a basic framework for DNAPL assessment is implicitly provided. A uniform methodology for RBCA closure of VOC (volatile organic compounds) DNAPL sites can be used to achieve the program objectives of RCRA, CERCLA, and Brownfield or voluntary cleanup programs. The regulatory acceptance of the application of RBCA methods to DNAPL sites will require education and discussion, but the use of a uniform methodology should facilitate acceptance. |
| Keywords: | |