Comparison of laminar model,RANS, LES and VLES for simulation of liquid sloshing |
| |
| Institution: | 1. State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep?Sea Exploration, Shanghai 200240, China;3. COTEC Offshore Engineering Solutions, Beijing 100029, China;4. School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, Jiangsu, China;1. Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), No. 21, Arghavan St., North Dibajee, Farmanieh, Tehran, Iran;2. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran, Iran;1. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;1. Department of Maritime Technology and Operations, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-6009 Ålesund, Norway;2. Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway;1. Department of Ocean System Engineering, Jeju National University, Jeju 690-756, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Ocean Engineering, Texas A&M University, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | Liquid sloshing in storage tank is a fundamental problem of great engineering importance. Sloshing motion can be laminar or turbulent. However, the necessity for inclusion of turbulence in CFD simulation of sloshing flows has not yet been established. In this paper, three roll–induced sloshing cases are studied to assess the merits and shortcomings of the laminar model and three most–commonly used turbulence models (RANS k–ε, LES and Very LES). To overcome the deficiencies in the RANS and LES, the new Very LES (VLES) model, which combines the RANS k–ε and LES, is developed in this paper. The free surface profiles are reconstructed by a coupled Level–Set and Volume–of–Fluid (CLSVOF) method. To the authors’ knowledge, the comprehensive and systematical assessment of the effect of turbulence on sloshing simulation has not been reported in the literature. The numerical results are evaluated using experimental measurements from Delorme and Souto?Iglesias. The present study indicates that the inclusion of an appropriate turbulence model has a profound influence on the simulations of violent and non–violent sloshing flows. The VLES and LES models can provide accurate predictions of free surface profiles and impact pressures, whereas the laminar flow assumption and the RANS model cannot adequately capture the energy dissipation in the sloshing simulation and lead to the inaccurate flow predictions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Liquid sloshing Laminar flow assumption Turbulence model Very large eddy simulation CLSVOF |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
