Fish on the range:: the perils of crossing conceptual boundaries in natural resource policy |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Geography, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-2148, USA;2. Program in Environmental Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA;1. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR), La Paz, Mexico;2. CONACYT-Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, La Paz, Mexico;3. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, La Paz, Mexico;4. Centro Regional de Investigación Pesquera, La Paz, Mexico;1. Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0202, USA;2. Environmental Defense Fund, Oceans Program, 123 Mission St, 28th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA;3. Fisheries Ecology Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA;4. Comisión de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable del Estado de Sonora, Jalisco 903 Col. Sonora, San Luis Colorado, Sonora C.P. 83440, Mexico;1. Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, A.C. Jalisco s/n, Mineral Valenciana, Guanajuato, Gto, 36240, Mexico;2. Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura. Calle 20 No. 605-Sur, Guaymas, Son, 85400, Mexico;3. Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura, Av. Sábalo-Cerritos s/n, Mazatlán, Sin, 82112, Mexico;4. Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Paseo Clausen s/n, Mazatlán, Sin, 82000, Mexico;1. Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, 6182 Steele Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, United States;2. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of Santa Barbara, Bren Hall, Isla Vista, CA 93117, United States;3. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College Street, Hanover, NH 03755, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper examines the recurring theme that fisheries management ought to emulate the institutional arrangements governing other natural resources, such as public rangelands. Overly facile comparisons between fisheries and range have been based on a misguided vision of range policy and an obsession with the structure of property rights. The result has been a condition of “structural narcosis” that obscures obvious but important differences between range and fisheries and obstructs more productive and sophisticated attempts at comparative inquiry. This paper provides a more detailed contrast between past range and current fisheries policy in the United States, in pursuit of more realistic lessons for policy makers. Range management, the paper concludes, is evolving in directions that are instructive for fisheries, but the crossing of conceptual boundaries between these two resources must be undertaken with care and greater attention to detail. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
