首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

Evaluation of the Iranian guideline for deismic rehabilitation of existing buildings
作者姓名:Ali  Reza  Keyvani  Boroujeni  Majid  Sadeghazar
作者单位:University of Tehran, Iran
摘    要:The Iranian Guideline for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (GSREB), which is currently used for vulnerability assessment of existing buildings in Iran, is evaluated in this paper. The vulnerability of sample buildings of a variety stories with special steel moment resisting frames, designed according to the Standard No.2800 requirements, is assessed by GSREB. In the vulnerability assessment, different analysis methods were used and the results, in terms of usage ratio, defined as the ratio of the strength/deformation demand to the corresponding capacity, are compared. Numerical results show that some columns of these buildings do not satisfy the life safety performance criteria in the design hazard level. Moreover, the target displacement estimated by the Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) is larger than the maximum displacement calculated by nonlinear dynamic analysis.

关 键 词:伊朗  GSREB  2800号标准  现有建筑  地震重建  位移系数法  易受损性  地震分析  结构评价
文章编号:1671-3664(2006)02-0297-11
收稿时间:2006-01-16
修稿时间:2006-04-18

Evaluation of the Iranian guideline for deismic rehabilitation of existing buildings
Ali Reza Keyvani Boroujeni Majid Sadeghazar.Evaluation of the Iranian guideline for deismic rehabilitation of existing buildings[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2006,5(2):297-307.
Authors:Ali Reza Keyvani Boroujeni  Majid Sadeghazar
Institution:University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract:The Iranian Guideline for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (GSREB), which is currently used for vulnerability assessment of existing buildings in Iran, is evaluated in this paper. The vulnerability of sample buildings of a variety stories with special steel moment resisting frames, designed according to the Standard No.2800 requirements, is assessed by GSREB. In the vulnerability assessment, different analysis methods were used and the results, in terms of usage ratio, defined as the ratio of the strength/deformation demand to the corresponding capacity, are compared. Numerical results show that some columns of these buildings do not satisfy the life safety performance criteria in the design hazard level. Moreover, the target displacement estimated by the Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) is larger than the maximum displacement calculated by nonlinear dynamic analysis.
Keywords:FEMA 356  vulnerability assessment  Standard No  2800  performance-based procedures  GSREB  displacement coefficient method
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号