Oral histories in meteoritics and planetary science – XXII: John T. Wasson

In this interview, John Wasson (Fig.  1 ) describes his childhood and undergraduate years in Arkansas and his desire to pursue nuclear chemistry as a graduate student at MIT. Upon graduation, John spent time in Munich (Technische Hochschule), the Air Force Labs in Cambridge, MA, and a sabbatical at the University of Bern where he developed his interests in meteorites. Upon obtaining his faculty position at UCLA, John established a neutron activation laboratory and began a long series of projects on the bulk compositions of iron meteorites and chondrites. He developed the chemical classification scheme for iron meteorites, gathered a huge set of iron meteorite compositional data with resultant insights into their formation, and documented the refractory and moderately volatile element trends that characterize the chondrites and chondrules. He also spent several years studying field relations and compositions of layered tektites from Southeast Asia, proposing an origin by radiant heating from a mega‐Tunguska explosion. Recently, John has explored oxygen isotope patterns in meteorites and their constituents believing the oxygen isotope results to be some of the most important discoveries in cosmochemistry. John also describes the role of postdoctoral colleagues and their important work, his efforts in the reorganization and modernization of the Meteoritical Society, his contributions in reshaping the journal Meteoritics, and how, with UCLA colleagues, he organized two meetings of the society. John Wasson earned the Leonard Medal of the Meteoritical Society in 1992 and the J. Lawrence Smith Medal of the National Academy in 2003.

Figure 1 Open in figure viewer PowerPoint John T. Wasson.

DS

John, thank you for letting me document your oral history. Let us start with my normal opening question, how did you get interested in meteorites?

JW

My Ph.D. research was in nuclear chemistry at MIT. Until late in my studies I thought I could be a nuclear chemist using the classical scientific method. That is, you gather data on a topic that seems interesting, you look for patterns in the data, and you write an interpretative paper that explains the data. I had learned, though, by going to Gordon Conferences, that this was not the way nuclear chemistry was being done. Nuclear chemists measured gamma ray energies as accurately as they could, they tried to fit these into energy levels diagrams, and then the nuclear physicists took over and interpreted the data. The nuclear physicists looked for the patterns in the energy‐level diagrams and made the models. That was not what I had in mind. But while I was at MIT, I heard lectures by Harold Urey, Hans Suess, and James Arnold. These were people whose backgrounds were not that different from mine and all three extolled the virtues of working on meteorites, and how you could learn neat things about how the solar system worked. That's a strength of MIT, exposure to neat ideas, and I credit the institution for doing this. So that was it. I was hooked.

DS

You have talked to us about how you became interested in meteorites, let's go back and talk about your precollege years.