首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

共享住宿与传统住宿的时空演变对比分析——以上海市为例
引用本文:李莉,侯国林,冯润东,席建超. 共享住宿与传统住宿的时空演变对比分析——以上海市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(8): 1310-1320. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.08.005
作者姓名:李莉  侯国林  冯润东  席建超
作者单位:1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所/中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
2.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049
3.南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京 210023
4.江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41671151);国家自然科学基金项目(41771151);文化和旅游部2019年度专业研究生重点研究扶持项目(WLRCY2019-50)
摘    要:随着社会消费方式越来越注重个性化,住宿新业态(尤其是共享住宿)的发展在创造新的经济增长点的同时,其与传统住宿的相互联系引发了学术界的广泛关注.论文以上海市为研究对象,采用空间自相关、核密度估计,分析传统住宿和共享住宿的时空演变态势与空间关联性,并利用地理探测器,探究了两者在区位选择上的差异.结果显示:①传统住宿和共享住...

关 键 词:共享住宿  传统住宿  时空演变  对比分析  上海市
收稿时间:2021-01-04
修稿时间:2021-04-11

Comparative analysis of the spatiotemporal change of sharing accommodations and traditional accommodations:A case study of Shanghai
LI Li,HOU Guolin,FENG Rundong,XI Jianchao. Comparative analysis of the spatiotemporal change of sharing accommodations and traditional accommodations:A case study of Shanghai[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(8): 1310-1320. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.08.005
Authors:LI Li  HOU Guolin  FENG Rundong  XI Jianchao
Abstract:With the increasing personalization of consumption, the development of new accommodation forms, especially sharing accommodations, is creating new economic growth points, while its interaction with traditional accommodations has attracted extensive academic attention. Using spatial autocorrelation and kernel density estimation, this study analyzed the spatial and temporal dynamics and spatial correlation of traditional and sharing accommodations in Shanghai, and explored the differences between them in terms of location selection factors by using the geographical detector. The results reveal that: 1) The spatial agglomeration of both traditional and sharing accommodations has increased significantly, but the spatial agglomeration of sharing accommodations has a tendency to rise first and then fall. 2) Traditional accommodations show a shift from a spatial expansion pattern dominated by contact diffusion to that supplemented by jump diffusion, while sharing accommodations show a spatial expansion pattern with contact diffusion and jump diffusion in parallel. 3) The positive correlation between the two has been growing during the study period, with the proportion of synergistic type increasing and the proportion of trade-off type gradually decreasing. 4) Sharing accommodations are more influenced by subway stations, public services, housing prices, and housing supply, while traditional accommodations are more sensitive to road density and regional economic development level. The differences and correlations between the spatial layout of traditional accommodations and sharing accommodations in different regional contexts and research scales deserve further exploration in the future.
Keywords:sharing accommodation  traditional accommodation  spatiotemporal change  comparative analysis  Shanghai City  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理科学进展》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号