首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Accumulation by securitization: Commercial poaching,neoliberal conservation,and the creation of new wildlife frontiers
Affiliation:1. Forests and Governance Program, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia;2. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA;3. Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 550 N. Park St., Madison, WI 53706, USA;1. Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway;2. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Scientific Domain (SD) 5 – Ecosystem Services, Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya;1. Centre for the Advancement of Scholarship, University of Pretoria, South Africa;2. Centre for Environmental Humanities South and Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract:Part of a broader interest in the escalating securitization of conservation practice, scholars are beginning to take note of an emerging relationship between conservation–securitization, capital accumulation, and dispossession. We develop the concept of accumulation by securitization to better grasp this trend, positioning it in the critical literatures on neoliberal conservation, green grabbing, and conservation-security. The concept captures the ways in which capital accumulation, often tied to land and resource enclosure, is enabled by practices and logics of security. Security logics, moreover, increasingly provoke the dispossession of vulnerable communities, thereby enabling accumulation. We ground the concept by turning to the Greater Lebombo Conservancy (GLC) in the Mozambican borderlands. This is a new privately-held conservancy built as a securitized buffer zone to obstruct the movement of commercial rhino poachers into South Africa’s adjacent Kruger National Park. We show how wildlife tourism-related accumulation here is enabled by, and in some ways contingent upon, the GLC’s success in curbing poaching incursions, and, relatedly, how security concerns become the grounds upon which resident communities are displaced. In terms of the latter, we suggest security provides a troubling, depoliticized alibi for dispossession. Like broader neoliberal conservation and green grabbing, we illustrate how accumulation by securitization plays out within complex new networks of state and private actors. Yet these significantly expand to include including security actors and others motivated by security concerns.
Keywords:Accumulation by dispossession  Neoliberal conservation/green grabbing  Securitization  Displacement  Commercial poaching/wildlife crime  Transboundary conservation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号