首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

薄互层地层震电波场响应特征
引用本文:彭蓉, 王佳新, 刘子淳, 曹殿华, 李华飞. 2022. 薄互层地层震电波场响应特征. 地球物理学报, 65(2): 785-795, doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0060
作者姓名:彭蓉  王佳新  刘子淳  曹殿华  李华飞
作者单位:中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所,自然资源部成矿作用与资源评价重点实验室,北京100037;中海油研究总院,北京100028;东方地球物理公司研究院,涿州 072750
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(42004123);中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20211412);中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所基本科研业务费(KK1929);国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC06002009)联合资助。
摘    要:

震电耦合产生的伴随震电场(CS)和震电界面场(IR)具有不同的强度,且能够反映地下地质体界面信息的震电界面响应一般较弱,而震电界面响应场可能在薄互层地质背景下能够出现较强的振幅值.目前还未有针对薄互层震电波场响应特征分析,且纵波引起的震电界面响应场是否对薄互层敏感有待探究.本文基于体积电荷密度的震电耦合理论数值模拟了平行薄互层(VTI)和倾斜薄互层(HTI)地质背景下的震电波场响应特征.结果表明,伴随纵波传播而产生的CS震电场几乎不受平行薄互层和楔形薄互层的影响.纵波在界面处诱导产生的IR震电场对垂直薄互层不敏感,但水平薄互层和楔形薄互层模型的厚度和薄互层的层数均能影响IR震电信号,薄互层单层厚度减小和薄互层层数增加会导致IR信号的增强.结果有力证明了纵波引起的震电界面响应场在薄互层地质体处会产生振幅异常,而水平和垂直薄互层的震电波场差异也有将助于探究层理方向有显著差异的页岩等储层中产生的震电信号.



关 键 词:震电波场特征  震电效应  伴随震电场  震电界面场  薄互层
收稿时间:2021-01-25
修稿时间:2021-11-09

Wavefield characteristics of seismoelectric effects in thin-interbeds
PENG Rong, WANG JiaXin, LIU ZiChun, CAO DianHua, LI HuaFei. 2022. Wavefield characteristics of seismoelectric effects in thin-interbeds. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 65(2): 785-795, doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0060
Authors:PENG Rong  WANG JiaXin  LIU ZiChun  CAO DianHua  LI HuaFei
Affiliation:1. MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, CAGS, Beijing 100037, China; 2. CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100028, China; 3. BGP INC. China National Petroleum Corporation, Zhuozhou 072750, China
Abstract:The Coseismic Field (CS) and the seismoelectric Interface Response (IR) generated by seismoelectric coupling have different signal strengths. The seismoelectric interface response which can reflect the interface information of the underground geological body is generally weaker than CS signals, while it may be strong in a thin-interbed geological case. At present, there is little detailed analysis on the wavefield characteristics of seismoelectric effects in thin interbeds, and whether the seismoelectric interface response caused by P-waves is sensitive to thin-interbeds remains to be examined. Based on the seismoelectric coupling theory of the charge per unit pore volume as an alternative to the zeta potential-based model, the wavefield characteristics of seismoelectric coupling are simulated under the geological background of horizontal and inclined thin-interbeds. Results show that the CS signals propagating along with the P-wave propagation are almost not affected by horizontal and wedge-shaped thin-interbeds. The IR field induced by P-waves at the interface are not sensitive to Vertical Thin-Interbeds (VTI), but the thickness and number of layers of Horizontal Thin-Interbeds (HTI) and wedge-shaped thin-interbeds have a notable effect on this field. The decrease of the thickness of a single layer in thin-interbeds and the increase of the number of layers of thin-interbeds can lead to the enhancement of IR signal. Results clearly prove that the seismoelectric interface response field caused by P-waves can produce an amplitude anomaly in thin-interbeds, also, the differences of seismoelectric wavefields between the horizontal and vertical thin-interbeds may have a potential to gain insight into the seismoelectric signal produced in shale or other reservoirs with significant differences in bedding direction.
Keywords:Wavefield characteristics  Seismoelectric effects  Coseismic field  Seismoelectric interface response  Thin-interbeds
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号