Basaltic magmatism on the Moon: A perspective from volcanic picritic glass beads

It is widely accepted that basaltic magmas are products of partial fusion of periodotite within planetary mantles. As such, they provide valuable insights into the composition, structure, and processes of planetary interiors. Those compositions which approach primary melt compositions provide the most direct information about planetary interiors and serve as a starting point to understand basaltic evolution. Within the collection of lunar samples returned by the Apollo and Luna missions are homogeneous, picritic glass beads of volcanic origin. These picritic glasses are our closest approximations to primary magmas. As such, these glass beads provide a unique perspective concerning the origin of mare basalts, the characteristics of the lunar interior, and processes in the early differentiation of the Moon. We have obtained trace element data for these picritic glasses using SIMS techniques. These data and literature isotopic and experimental data on the picritic glasses are placed within the framework of mare basaltic magmatism.The volcanic glasses are very diverse in their trace element characteristics, for example, they have a wide range of REE pattern shapes and concentrations. Like the crystalline mare basalts, all picritic glasses have a negative Eu anomaly. Unlike the crystalline mare basalts, there is little correlation between the size of the Eu anomaly and overall REE concentrations. Trace element differences among the various glasses suggests that a KREEP component was incorporated into their mantle source. This implies large scale mixing of the “Lunar Magma Ocean”-derived cumulate pile. Subtle differences among glasses suggest that local mixing of sources may also have been an important process. Preservation of subtle chemical differences in the picritic glasses and crystalline basalts may be interpreted as indicating that they were produced by small to moderate degrees of partial melting and that the lunar mantle did not experience extensive melting during episodes of mare volcanism.Several lines of evidence are consistent with the view that the picritic glasses were derived from mantle sources that were compositionally distinct from the sources for crystalline mare basalts. These are parallel, but no common, liquid lines of descent; chemical differences between picritic glasses and the more primitive crystalline mare basalts; experimental studies indicating that the picritic glasses are multiply saturated at depths greater than that of the mare basalts; differences in lead isotopic data; and the mode of eruption (i.e., fire fountaining for glass beads). These data also provide circumstantial evidence that suggests that the picritic glasses were derived from a source somewhat more volatile-rich than that of the mare basalts.Several petrogenetic models are suggested by the trace element characteristics of the picritic glasses:

• 1.(1) Partial melting of heterogeneous lunar mantle at depths greater than 300 km to produce the parental magmas (picritic) for both the mare basalts and picritic glasses. Picritic magmas represented by glass beads were erupted to the surface with small degrees of fractional crystallization while mare basalts were produced by larger degrees of fractional crystallization (15–30%) of similar (but not identical) picritic magmas.
• 2.(2) Picritic magmas represented by the glass beads were generated at depths greater than 400 km in a volatile-enriched (relative to the mare basalt source) heterogeneous mantle while mare basalts are fractional crystallization products of picritic magmas generated at depths of less than 400 km.
• 3.(3) The picritic magmas represented by the glass beads represent polybaric melting that initiated at depths of at least 1000 km. A primitive mantle component or less processed cumulate mantle components may have been involved in the generation of the picritic glasses in any of these models.