关于城镇规划的哲学思考

本文针对城镇规划中出现的求大求全现象，运用对立统一的辩证观进行了分析和探讨，认为规划者和领导者在城镇规划和建设的各阶段过程中中都应进行哲学的理性思考，正确处理好规划建设中理想与现实的矛盾统一。     

On being a ‘real’ geomorphologist

In a recent editorial Richards (1990) advocated a realist perspective for geomorphology. Scientific realism, defined broadly, is the doctrine that science attempts to generate true knowledge of the observable and unobservable (i.e. non-empirical) aspects of an objective world. Various brands of realism exist; the particular version cited by Richards (1990) has not strongly influenced mainstream philosophy of science. Also, critical rationalism, which Richards (1990) contrasts with realism, fully adopts a realist perspective. In its broadest sense, realism encompasses the entire spectrum of geomorpho-logic research, thus providing a unifying philosophical framework for geomorphology.     

我国近代地理学开创者白眉初的新地理观

白眉初（1876-1940）是我国近代地理学家,是中国地理学发展史上,从古代地理常识向近代科学地理学发展阶段新地理观的倡导者之一。他最早提出地理学研究要着重于人地关系因素;认为地理学是一门具有宏观性、时效性、社会功能性的学科。白眉初的《地理哲学》一书,比较系统地反映了他的地理学思想。他主要负责编辑的《地学杂志》,为中国...     

The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services

While a sustained flow of ecosystem services brings tangible benefits to humans, some ecosystem states and suites of services may be more desired by some people than others. Allocating or using the flow of services is loaded with asymmetries, complex power dynamics and political struggles between groups of people. We argue that the issues associated with such allocation and use questions are poorly integrated into the literatures of resilience, sustainability, and vulnerability. To illustrate this, we focus on three socially constructed factors that inhibit a fuller understanding about how to sustain the flow of ecosystem services: (1) rigidity/poverty traps; (2) power asymmetries; and (3) scientization of policy/politicization of science. These factors limit our ability to assess the sustainable flows of ecosystem services, and in particular to better understand the trade-offs and limits to aggregate human activity. We demonstrate that an improved understanding of the allocation trade-offs and limits to the flows of ecosystem services could result from more applied research that integrates the developing fields of deliberative democracy, pragmatic environmental philosophy, and legitimacy and rule compliance. Without the understanding that such integration would bring, researchers and policy makers risk underestimating the limits on flows of ecosystem services and how to accomplish their provision toward the greater collective - rather than individual - good.     

求索地质学50年

我已年逾古稀,垂垂老矣。地质生涯中积累的经验和问题,理应贡献给年轻一代,以期经验能够相传,问题得到解决。年轻地质学家需要寻求名师指点,锤炼踏实的基本功;要踏遍世间群山,阅历地质现象,胸中累积千百地质实例;要熟读文献千卷,把文献中的实例与胸中实例融会贯通。如此,就可以把野外、室内识别、理解地质现象的能力和地质学最主要的工作方法—对比与联想融合在一起,能够解开任何地质难题。年轻地质学家还需要学习近年来科学哲学的内容和进展。为的是理解科学的本质,地质学的本质,以及地质学与其它学科的关系。这有利于青年学者选择最接近科学范式的、最重要的研究项目;也有利于提高逻辑推理能力。地质学和科学哲学功底最好的年轻学者,可以为地学哲学作出贡献。本文提出6个方面的问题,供年轻学者参考。     

试论哲学的存在方式

述了专门哲学著作与非专门哲学著作的存在性。着重强调了非哲学著作对哲学研究和发展的现实意义。     

勘查哲学与油气勘探开发方针

油气矿产资源是自然界的一种客观存在,它的形成与分布具有一定规律性。坚持勘查哲学的基本原理与思维方式,运用唯物主义、辩证法的方法论和认识论,充分发挥主体在油气矿产勘查中的主观能动性,正确处理富油气区与贫油气区的关系,探索松南油气新区带、新领域。     

Comments on richards: The problems of ‘real’ geomorphology

A number of comments are made as a response to the editorial “Real” geomorphology' (Richards, 1990). The call for more involvement by geomorphologists in current philosophical debate is welcomed and the adoption of a broadly realist scientific approach is supported. Some contentious issues arise from this debate and these are outlined and discussed.     

隐伏矿床勘查哲学探讨

矿产勘查哲学是在进入20世纪70年代以后,地表易发现、易识别矿床的日趋减少,矿床发现率不断下降,导致部分矿产勘查工作者出现悲观思潮的背景下诞生的;阐述了矿产勘查哲学的主要研究内容是指导矿产勘查工作的一整套基本原理和原则;介绍了不同学者对矿产勘查哲学的认识,论述了矿产勘查哲学在矿产百年找矿史中的应用,提出了隐伏矿床勘查的突破更需要矿产勘查哲学的指导。