排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
James Douglas Langston Rebecca Anne Riggs Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono Agustinus Kastanya Jeffrey Sayer 《Singapore journal of tropical geography》2020,41(3):413-431
Seram is Indonesia's 8th largest island. It is central to the historic spice islands, once a hotbed for international trade of profitable tree-products, primarily clove and nutmeg. Recent increased rates of social and ecological change, including costly conflicts, present Seram with new challenges and opportunities for conservation and development. Using place-based transdisciplinary research methods, we diagnose the problems emerging in Seram. Engaging with actors across multiple scales and sectors, we explore drivers of change, social-ecological impacts, and institutional arrangements that might achieve improved inclusive and sustainable development outcomes. Traditional and formal governance arrangements require harmonizing to optimize the benefits and costs from large-scale investments arriving in Seram. Organizations wishing to achieve positive impact can more strategically engage with the broad range of actors to harmonize divergent visions for the future and confront the reality of incoming investments and infrastructure. 相似文献
2.
Engaging communities in managing multiple hazards: Reflections from small islands in North Sulawesi,Indonesia
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Singapore journal of tropical geography》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
Mercy M.F. Rampengan Lisa Law J.C. Gaillard Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono Jeffrey Sayer 《Singapore journal of tropical geography》2016,37(2):249-267
Participatory methods are a common approach for giving voice to local communities in hazard and disaster research. Drawing on a study that trialled and modified a range of participatory methods in North Sulawesi, eastern Indonesia, this paper reflects on how such methods help document the capacities of small island communities. We assessed capacity from a sustainable livelihoods perspective, identifying the assets that enable villagers to cope with hazards. This overall approach promoted a discourse of strengths and resourcefulness, contrasting with vulnerability and needs‐assessment approaches common to government and non‐governmental organizations, which tend to focus on weaknesses and can sometimes fuel undeliverable expectations of funding. We provide a critical reflection on participatory methods and their significance for researchers, policy makers and funding agencies working with communities in hazard‐prone regions. 相似文献
1