Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2009

Every three years the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements revises tables giving the directions of the poles of rotation and the prime meridians of the planets, satellites, minor planets, and comets. This report takes into account the IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN) and the IAU Committee on Small Body Nomenclature (CSBN) definition of dwarf planets, introduces improved values for the pole and rotation rate of Mercury, returns the rotation rate of Jupiter to a previous value, introduces improved values for the rotation of five satellites of Saturn, and adds the equatorial radius of the Sun for comparison. It also adds or updates size and shape information for the Earth, Mars?? satellites Deimos and Phobos, the four Galilean satellites of Jupiter, and 22 satellites of Saturn. Pole, rotation, and size information has been added for the asteroids (21) Lutetia, (511) Davida, and (2867) ?teins. Pole and rotation information has been added for (2) Pallas and (21) Lutetia. Pole and rotation and mean radius information has been added for (1) Ceres. Pole information has been updated for (4) Vesta. The high precision realization for the pole and rotation rate of the Moon is updated. Alternative orientation models for Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn are noted. The Working Group also reaffirms that once an observable feature at a defined longitude is chosen, a longitude definition origin should not change except under unusual circumstances. It is also noted that alternative coordinate systems may exist for various (e.g. dynamical) purposes, but specific cartographic coordinate system information continues to be recommended for each body. The Working Group elaborates on its purpose, and also announces its plans to occasionally provide limited updates to its recommendations via its website, in order to address community needs for some updates more often than every 3 years. Brief recommendations are also made to the general planetary community regarding the need for controlled products, and improved or consensus rotation models for Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.     

Erratum to: Reports of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2006 & 2009

The primary poles for (243) Ida and (134340) Pluto and its satellite (134340) Pluto : I Charon were redefined in the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements (WGCCRE) 2006 report (Seidelmann et al. in Celest Mech Dyn Astr 98:155, 2007), and 2009 report (Archinal et al. in Celest Mech Dyn Astr 109:101, 2011), respectively, to be consistent with the primary poles of similar Solar System bodies. However, the WGCCRE failed to take into account the effect of the redefinition of the poles on the values of the rotation angle W at J2000.0. The revised relationships in Table 3 of Archinal et al. 2011) are $$\begin{array}{llll} W & = & 274^{\circ}.05 +1864^{\circ}.6280070\, d\;{\rm for\; (243)\,Ida} \\ W & = & 302^{\circ} .695 + 56^{\circ} .3625225\, d\;{\rm for\; (134340)\,Pluto,\; and}\\ W & = & 122^{\circ} .695 + 56^{\circ} .3625225\, d\;{\rm for\; (134340)\,Pluto : I \,Charon}\end{array}$$ where d is the time in TDB days from J2000.0 (JD2451545.0).     

A model and map of Amalthea

A topographic model of Amalthea (JV) was derived from the shapes of limbs and terminators in Voyager images, modified locally to accommodate large craters and ridges. The model is presented in tabular and graphic form, including the first detailed shaded relief maps of the satellite. The shape is very irregular, with radii varying between about 53 and 151 ± 5 km. The minimum value occurs in a deep crater at the south pole. The volume is estimated to be 2.5 ± 0.5 × 10⁶km³. A prominent groove or valley extends some 150 km across the trailing side. High albedo, spectrally distinct markings are mapped and found to have a less obvious relationship with relief than previously suggested.     

The Influence of Reactive Torques on Comet Nucleus Rotation

Reactive torques, due to anisotropic sublimation on a comet nucleus surface, produce slow variations of its rotation. In this paper the secular effects of this sublimation are studied. The general rotational equations of motion are averaged over unperturbed fast rotation around the mass center (Euler-Poinsot motion) and over the orbital comet motion. We discuss the parameters that define typical properties of the rotational evolution and discover different classifications of the rotational evolution. As an example we discuss some possible scenarios of rotational evolution for the nuclei of the comets Halley and Borrelly.     

Topography and geology of Hyperion

I have mapped the Saturnian satellite Hyperion using Voyager 2 images obtained in 1981 and a shape model derived from the results of Thomas et al. (1995). The results are presented in tabular and graphic form, including detailed shaded relief maps of the satellite. The shape is approximated by a triaxial ellipsoid with axes of 270, 201 and 336 km. The volume is estimated to be 9.5 ± 2.0 × 10⁶ km³. Geological interpretations were augmented by the use of super-resolution image composites. The surface is heavily cratered. A system of scarps and an isolated mountain are interpreted as the rim and central peak of an impact crater with a diameter similar to the mean diameter of the satellite itself, the largest crater with recognizable impact morphology in relation to the size of the body yet observed in the solar system. The crater density dates that impact, not the formation of Hyperion. Grooves are identified in several images, and form part of a zone of fracturing radial to a prominent crater.University of Western Ontario     

The topography of Janus

A topographic model of Saturn's larger co-orbital satellite Janus was derived from the shapes of limbs and terminators in Voyager images, modified locally to accommodate large craters and ridges. The model is presented here in tabular and graphic form, including the first detailed shaded relief maps of the satellite. The shape is approximated by a triaxial ellipsoid with axes of 196, 192 and 150 km. The volume is estimated to be 3.0 ± 0.5 × 10⁶ km³, leading to a density estimate of 0.67 ± 0.10 g/cm³. The surface is heavily cratered. Several possible crater chains of uncertain significance are observed, but few prominent linear ridges and no narrow grooves.     

Linear features on asteroid 951 Gaspra

Galileo images of asteroid 951 Gaspra reveal numerous linear ridges, crater chains and valleys. I describe? all visible linear features and assess their significance. A few crater chains may be chance alignments of impact craters, but most linear features are probably surface expressions of deep fractures caused by impact, perhaps exploiting systems of joints. Some features not previously recognised are documented, and one previously described structure, a ‘chevron’ form near the north pole, is shown to be an artifact. The global distribution suggests a monolithic interior. Two separate sets of grooves may have been formed by different impacts. One group of four or five parallel, wide but extremely subdued depressions may indicate the presence of a thicker or more mobile regolith accumulated on a sloping, rotational leading surface.     

Horizon Topography and the Location Of Viking Lander 2

The location of Viking Lander 2 on Mars is determined by matching features seen on the horizon with hills visible in Viking Orbiter images. Three possible positions are found, with one being preferred, confirming and refining the position determined previously by radio tracking. The often stated opinion that a lobe of ejecta from the large crater Mie is visible in lander images is shown to be false. The most prominent hill on the eastern horizonis Goldstone, a pedestal crater 8 km from the lander. Another hill16 km from the preferred position is just visible to the north. The image processing procedures used to enhance visibility of low relief features on the horizon should be useful for several future missions. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

A model of the gravitational field of Amalthea

Utilizing the topographic model of Jovian moon Amalthea (Stooke, 1994) and supposing that its mass density is constant we derived its basic geometrical and dynamical characteristics. For calculations the harmonic model of topography of the degree and order 18 was selected. The model appears to fit the entire surface to a mean accuracy of a few hundred meters, except in the regions localized around longitudes 0° and 180°. On the basis of the harmonic expansion of the topography we estimated the volume (V = 2.43 ± 0.02 km³) and the mean radius of topographyr ₀ = (79.7 ± 0.2) km. Generalized moments of inertia up to the order 2, principal moments of inertia and orientation of the principal axes with respect to the original reference frame were also calculated. The results show that although Amalthea has extremely irregular shape it may be treated dynamically as an almost symmetric body (B C). Finally, the set of the Stokes coefficients up to the degree and order 9 was evaluated. The results are verified by direct numerical integration.     

Report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on cartographic coordinates and rotational elements: 2006

Every three years the IAU/IAG Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements revises tables giving the directions of the poles of rotation and the prime meridians of the planets, satellites, minor planets, and comets. This report introduces improved values for the pole and rotation rate of Pluto, Charon, and Phoebe, the pole of Jupiter, the sizes and shapes of Saturn satellites and Charon, and the poles, rotation rates, and sizes of some minor planets and comets. A high precision realization for the pole and rotation rate of the Moon is provided. The expression for the Sun’s rotation has been changed to be consistent with the planets and to account for light travel time