Behavior of Dry-Mixed and Permeated Laponite-Treated Sand: From Small Strains to Critical State

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering - Laponite—a synthetic nanoclay with (2:1) layer structure—has shown promise for the improvement of granular deposits susceptible to earthquake...     

Deformation analysis of shallow penetration in clay

A new method of analysis is described for estimating the deformations and strains caused by shallow undrained penetration of piles and caissons in clay. The formulation combines previous analyses for steady, deep penetration, with methods used to compute soil deformations due to near-surface ground loss, and is referred to as the Shallow Strain Path Method (SSPM). Complete analytical solutions for the velocity and strain rates are given for a planar wall, an axisymmetric, closed-ended pile and unplugged, open-ended pile geometries. In these examples, the analyses consider a single source penetrating through the soil at a constant rate, generating a family of penetrometers with rounded tips, referred to as simple wall, pile and tube geometries. Soil deformations and strains are obtained by integrating the velocity and strain rates along the particle paths. The transition from shallow to deep penetration is analysed in detail. Shallow penetration causes heave at the ground surface, while settlements occur only in a thin veneer of material adjacent to the shaft and in a bulb-shaped region around the tip. The size of this region increases with the embedment depth. Deformations inside an open-ended pile/caisson are affected significantly by details of the simple tube wall geometry. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Drained and undrained pullout capacity of a stiff inclusion in a saturated poroelastic matrix

Shear‐lag analysis is used to obtain closed‐form solutions for the problem of a stiff inclusion embedded in a poroelastic soil matrix. The following assumptions are made: the soil matrix and the inclusion are elastic; plane strain conditions apply; and shear stresses at the soil‐inclusion interface follow Coulomb's friction law. Two solutions are obtained, the first one for drained conditions where no excess pore pressures are generated, and the second one for undrained conditions where excess pore pressures are produced and the soil does not change volume during pullout. The solutions are verified by comparing analytical predictions with numerical results obtained using a finite element method. Predictions from the analytical solutions are also compared with results from experiments conducted in a large‐scale pullout box. Both comparisons show good agreement. The analytical solution shows that the pullout capacity in drained and undrained conditions is overall independent of the relative stiffness of the soil and the inclusion. The most important factor controlling the pullout capacity is the coefficient of friction between the soil and the inclusion. Both drained and undrained pullout capacities increase with the coefficient of friction; although the drained capacity shows a proportional increase, it is not so for the undrained capacity. The ratio of undrained to drained pullout capacity is about 0.9 for friction coefficients smaller than 0.2, but can be as small as 0.6 for a coefficient of friction of 1.0. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.