The Four-Phase AFM Assemblage Staurolite--Aluminum Silicate--Biotite--Garnet: Extra Components and Implications for Staurolite--Out Isograds

The prograde disappearance of staurolite can be described inthe model system K₂O-FeO-MgO-Al₂O₃-SiO₂-H₂O (KFMASH) by thereaction: staurolite + muscovite + quartz = biotite + aluminumsilicate + garnet + water. The common occurrence and world—widedistribution of the assemblage staurolite-biotite-aluminum silicate-garnet(SBAG) in quartz-mica-schist suggest that the model reactionmay be over-simplified. Previous workers have suggested thatthe SBAG assemblage (1) is a strictly divariant assemblage thatbuffered water activity, (2) is stabilized by non-KFMASH components,and (3) did not attain equilibrium. We used least-squares regression to show that balanced reactionsdo not exist among the minerals in samples of SBAG assemblagesfrom Califonia and New England. The absence of reaction relationshipscan be explained by imbalances in two or three of the minorelements Zn, Mn, and either Ca or Na. The assemblage is apparentlystabilized by non-KFMASH components. Criteria for mapping staurolite-out isograds that representthe conditions of the KFMASH staurolite-out reaction dependon which of the four phases is the ‘extra’ phase,and require an understanding of the thermodynamic effects ofall the ‘extra’ components. Our results suggestthat transition zones of SBAG assemblages near staurolite-outisograds are the result of ‘extra’ components. However,it is uncertain whether µH²O of fluids in equilibriumwith SBAG assemblages varied across such zones.     

Buffering in the assemblage staurolite-aluminium silicate-biotite-garnet-chlorite

Abstract The assemblage muscovite-quartz-staurolite-aluminium silicate-biotite-garnet-chlorite with H₂O (SABGC assemblage) is invariant in the K₂O-FeO-MgO-Al₂O₃-SiO₂-H₂O (KFMASH) system. Such five-phase AFM assemblages should be absent in nature, but reported occurrences from at least ten localities suggest that either the assemblage internally controls μH₂O or non-KFMASH components stabilize one or more of the phases. Least-squares regression analysis of minerals from South Royalton and Gassetts, Vermont, USA, demonstrates that subsets of the minerals in single SABGC assemblages from both localities are related by balanced reactions involving water. These results are consistent with the interpretation that the subassemblages fixed μH₂O at an arbitrary, specified pressure and temperature. Balanced dehydration reactions also may be written between minerals in the SABGC assemblages and four-phase assemblages from the same outcrops interpreted to have equilibrated at the same pressures and temperatures as the five-phase assemblages. These results suggest that different specimens from the same outcrops equilibrated at different values of μH₂O, supporting the conclusion that μH₂O was not controlled externally. We could not demonstrate internal control of fo₂ using measured mineral compositions because oxygen balance occurred in all reactions derived by regression. Regression analysis of published mineral compositions from New Mexico failed to identify balanced reactions involving water or oxygen either among the phases in a single SABGC assemblage or between SABGC and nearby four-phase assemblages. These results demonstrate that neither μH₂O nor fo₂ were fixed by the SABGC assemblages at these localities, and permit the interpretations that the assemblages were stabilized by the non-KFMASH components Na or Ca and that μH₂O and fo₂ were controlled externally.