宁夏草原实验站地区地质环境质量的GIS综合评价

宁夏草原实验站地区生态地质环境脆弱 ,土壤侵蚀 ,土地沙化 ,水质恶化等地质灾害现象较严重。为了提高全民保护和改善地质环境的意识 ,帮助政府部门制定环境管理和地区开发政策 ,利用模糊加权评价的数学模型 ,借助 GIS空间分析技术 ,对来自于多渠道的地质环境信息进行了综合分析 ,将研究区地质环境质量分为差、较差、中等、较好、良好 5个等级 ,并制作了地质环境质量综合评价分区图 ,为制定合理的地区经济开发和改善地质环境提供了直接的地质依据     

孢粉记录揭示的2万年以来若尔盖地区的气候变化

若尔盖黑河牧场ＤＣ剖面的孢粉记录表明，末次冰期晚阶段若尔盖原高的气候表现为不稳定性，即冷暖变化频繁，其基本变化与全球一致，相对暖的阶段发生在２０－１８ＫａＢＰ，１６－１５ＫａＢＰ和１３－１１．２ＫａＢＰ；相对冷的阶段在１８－１６ＫａＢＰ，１５－１４ＫａＢＰ和１１．２－１０．２ＫａＢＰ。其中末次冰期最盛期发生于１８－１６ＫａＢＰ；１１．２－１０．２ＫａＢＰ的降温可对应于ＹｏｕｎｇｅｒＤｒｙａｓ事件。     

老风口防风林工程初见成效

老风口位于塔城地区托里、额敏两县之间，S221省道公路横贯南北，是塔城公路交通的咽喉，也是塔城地区经济建设、东联西出的要道。由于特定的地理位置，老风口地区受偏东大风的灾害严重。特别是冬季，经常因为风吹雪暴，形成风雪流而阻塞交通，冻死人、畜，严重制约着塔城地区的经济建设和社会发展。为加快西部大开发的步代，改善塔城地区的投     

草原生态系统对气候变化和CO2浓度升高的响应

近年来,全球变化和区域响应已成为生态学、植物学、地学和农学的研究热点之一。全球变化引起全球温度升高、降水格局发生变化和土地利用方式改变，研究草原生态系统对全球变化的响应与适应是了解发展和预测陆地生态系统与全球变化相互关系的重要方面。文章对近十年来国内外在CO₂浓度升高、温度增加、水分变化等方面对草原生态系统影响的研究进行了评述, 以期加深草原生态系统对全球变化响应的理解，启发研究思路, 激发兴趣。最后提出了应着重加强研究的8个科学问题。     

围栏对新疆山区草地植被下土壤动物多样性的影响

通过对新疆典型山区草地———高山草甸、亚高山草甸、高山草原和亚高山草原野外实地监测,比较了草原围栏内外土壤动物的类群组成、个体数量及生态分布,讨论了围栏这一人为手段对山区草地植被下土壤动物的影响:土壤动物多样性为围栏内高于围栏外,但是受构建时间的限制,围栏内外差异不显著。土壤动物类群数和个体数的分布主要取决于草原植被、土壤有机质、土壤含水率等因子。     

青藏高原草地生态系统土壤有机碳动态特征

青藏高原草地碳动态对区域乃至全球碳循环都有非常重要的影响. 采用生态系统碳循环模型—CENTURY模型4.5版本探讨了青藏高原草地生态系统土壤有机碳(0~20 cm)在1960~2002年间的年际动态变化特征及其区域分异特征. CENTURY模型模拟的地上部分生物量与土壤表层有机碳与实测结果有较好的一致性. 从1960~2002年, 8个典型草地生态系统土壤有机碳含量表现出明显年际的波动, 变化幅度随生态系统土壤有机碳含量增加而增大; 青藏高原草地有机碳总量和主要草地生态系统有机碳总量也呈现出明显的年际变化, 而以1990~2000年期间的年际变化幅度最大, 在这期间主要生态系统有机碳总量都呈现出先上升而后迅速下降的变化. 土壤有机碳含量的区域分布特征表现出从东南向西北降低的地带性分异, 同时在东北和东南表现出非地带性分异特征. 该研究表明: 近40年来青藏高原典型草地生态系统随气候变动有比较敏感的响应, 同时, 在假定生态系统生理特性不变的条件下, 近10年来的气候变动增加了青藏高原草地土壤有机碳的积累和排放速度.     

Comparison of CO2 Effluxes and Their Driving Factors Between Two Temperate Steppes in Inner Mongolia, China

Soil respiration is a key component of the global terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. The static opaque chamber method was used to measure the CO2 effluxes from soil of a semiarid Aneurolepidium chinense steppe and a Stipa krylovii steppe in the Xilin River Basin of Inner Mongolia, China from March 2002 to December 2004. The results indicated that the soil respiration rates of the semiarid Aneurolepidium chinense steppe and the Stipa krylovii steppe were both relatively high from mid-May to mid-September of each year and remained low during the rest of the year. The minimum value of soil respiration occurred in December or January and negative effluxes of CO2 appeared for several days during the non-growing season of individual years at the two sampling sites. A high annual variation was found in the two steppes with the coefficients of variance (CV) being over 94%, even high to 131%. The annual sums of soil CO2 efflux of the Aneurolepidium chinense steppe varied between 356.4 gC m?2 yr?1 and 408.8 gC m?2 yr?1, while those of the Stipa krylovii steppe in the three years were in the range of 110.6 gC m?2 yr?1 to 148.6 gC m?2 yr?1. The mean respiration rates of the Aneurolepidium chinense steppe were significantly higher than those of the Stipa krylovii steppe in different statistical periods with the exception of the non-growing season. About 59.9% and 80.6% of the soil respiration variations in both steppes for the whole sampling period were caused by the changes of temperature and soil water content. In the Aneurolepidium chinense steppe, the soil respiration rate has significant or extremely significant positive correlation (r = 0.58 ? 0.85, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) with air temperature and ground temperature of the topsoil except in 2002; the unique contributions of temperature change to the soil respiration variation of the three years were 53.3%, 81.0% and 58.6%, respectively. But, for the Stipa krylovii steppe in the same time interval, the soil water content (especially that of the 10–20 cm layer) has a greater effect on the change of soil respiration, and the unique contributions of the change of the 10–20 cm soil water content to the variations of soil respiration in 2002 and 2003 were 60.0% and 54.3%, respectively. In 2004, in spite of the higher contribution of temperature than soil water content, the contribution of ground temperature at a depth of 10 cm was only 46.2%, much weaker than that of any single year in the Aneurolepidium chinense steppe.