Long distance transference of height datum across seas

This paper focuses on studying logn distance transference of height datum across seas by combining ellipsoidal height derived from GPS with gravimetric geoid height. The Yellow Sea Height Datum is transferred to Yangshan Island which is 30 km away from Luchaogang in Shanghai. The stations heights derived in this way are compared with those determined from two independent sets of the tidal observations taken in two years, and the difference values are 1.0 cm and 6.0 cm, respectively. Moreover, the derived height differences between two sections on the island are also compared with the values derived from precise leveling with respect to the same section. The result shows that the inconsistencies are only 0.2 cm and 0.7 cm, respectively.     

A local geoid determination based on ellipsoid approximation in Western China

A new methodology for precise geoid determination with finest local details based on ellipsoidal approximation is presented. This methodology is formulated through the “fixed-free two-boundary value problem” based on the observable of the type modulus of gravity intensity, gravity acceleration and gravity potential at the GPS positioned stations, with support of the known geoid's potential value, W0.     

Formal definition of a user-adaptive and length-optimal routing graph for complex indoor environments

Car routing solutions are omnipresent and solutions for pedestrians also exist. Furthermore, public or commercial buildings are getting bigger and the complexity of their internal structure has increased. Consequently, the need for indoor routing solutions has emerged. Some prototypes are available, but they still lack semantically-enriched modelling (e.g., access constraints, labels, etc.) and are not suitable for providing user-adaptive length-optimal routing in complex buildings. Previous approaches consider simple rooms, concave rooms, and corridors, but important characteristics such as distinct areas in huge rooms and solid obstacles inside rooms are not considered at all, although such details can increase navigation accuracy. By formally defining a weighted indoor routing graph, it is possible to create a detailed and user-adaptive model for route computation. The defined graph also contains semantic information such as room labels, door accessibility constraints, etc. Furthermore, one-way paths inside buildings are considered, as well as three-dimensional building parts, e.g., elevators or stairways. A hierarchical structure is also possible with the presented graph model.     

���������Ŷ���������߳��쳣�ķ���

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????й?????????????б???????ó????????????????????????????y??????????????????????????????????????????е????y??????????     

侏罗系、白垩系界线问题及对中国北方陆相界线的思考

侏罗系、白垩系间是显生宙唯一还没有定义系级GSSP的界线。生物演替在Thithonian期与Berriasian期之间不存在明显变化,很难找到可以进行全球对比的标志。作为中生代生物年代地层学主要划分依据的菊石类生物,亦受生物区系影响而难作为侏罗系、白垩系界线的标志。微体化石具有优势。近期,国际上趋于将瓮虫类Calpionella alpina带之底、钙质超微化石Nannoconus steinmannii minor和N.kamptneri minor二者的始现面作为侏罗系、白垩系界线,对应于极性带M19n.2n内部,年龄为145 Ma。国际地层划分与对比以海相为标准。中国侏罗系、白垩系以陆相地层发育为特征,与海相对比颇具难度。以陆相生物为标志的界线划分产生了地区性的生物年代地层格架,也形成了地方生物地层与国际年代地层对比的错位,导致中国陆相侏罗系、白垩系界线成为地学界争议的问题。本文认为,在综合考虑不同学科研究结果的同时,问题解决的实质是客观认识陆相生物对比的缺陷,结合考虑非生物的标准,如磁性地层、旋回地层和同位素测年的精度,获得超越相区的对比结果。基于陆相生物特点,着眼于宏观演化阶段来识别界线位置是问题解决的初期阶段。燕辽生物群与热河生物群是代表侏罗纪和白垩纪的两大生物演化类群,其间年龄可为土城子组顶部的139 Ma。这是为全方位研究而铺设的临时工作界线。今后将土城子组作为侏罗纪、白垩纪过渡地层而加大研究力度,有可能在该组顶部或其内部发现界线生物标志和同层位绝对年龄值,或许会使其向目前国际推荐年龄(145 Ma)更靠近一步;也不排除GSSP未定的国际侏罗系、白垩系界线年龄会向年轻方向变化,趋于139 Ma的Valanginian阶底界位置。     

�˼��̶߳�����Ĵ��ˮ׼�����ƴ��ˮ׼��֮���

???й???????????????????????SRTM3??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????к?????????????????????????????1.76 m?????????????????0.03 m??     

����ƽ�����ٶȷ��ָ�GOCE����������ģ��

???????????????????????δ???????λ??????????????GOCE????2009-11-01-2010-01-31???????????????????????????????120??ε??????????GOCE-AAA01S???????????????12???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????120??ε????????????±6.8 cm????6~120?????GOCE-AAA01S?????????EIGEN-CHAMP03S????102??????GOCE-AAA01S????????EGM96??????δ????????????????????????????λ??????г????????     

基于人居环境特征的青藏高原“无人区”空间界定

青藏高原独特的高寒环境与自然条件在一定程度上限制了人口的自然分布与有序发展,形成了中国面积大、分布广的“无人区”（UPAs）。然而,当前有关“无人区”面积、分布、特征与区域差异等研究尚无定论。客观、准确界定“无人区”的空间范围,对开展青藏高原资源环境承载力评价、国家公园与生态安全屏障建设等具有重要意义。基于青藏高原居民点分布信息,据其地形、气候、生态、土地利用等要素特征,本文综合表征了居民点的自然—生态—土地利用耦合关系,率定了居民点分布上限的各要素阈值,通过多要素空间叠加构建了“无人区”评价综合模型,并以居民点分布的自然极限、生态（含氧量）下限、土地利用规律为关键阈值界定了青藏高原“无人区”空间范围并分析了其地理分布特征。研究表明：① 以居民点分布累计比例< 0.1%计,确定“无人区”的地形阈值为海拔> 5665 m、相对高差> 2402 m、地形起伏度> 8.59,气候阈值为相对湿度< 76.2%、温湿指数< 33或 > 71。② 根据居民点分布及人体对含氧量耐受情况,确定“无人区”的生态阈值为气压< 500 hpa、大气含氧量< 40%。③ 青藏高原严格“无人区”面积达1912 km²,其中新疆699 km²、四川413 km²、西藏331 km²、青海291 km²、甘肃178 km²。空间上呈零星分散状,多分布在四川贡嘎山、珠穆朗玛峰附近等极高山地区、可可西里东部—罗布泊地区;以及少部分分布在青海柴达木盆地。     

城市群的界定与识别研究

城市群的界定与识别是城市群研究的重要内容之一。传统研究以实证数据判断为主,但由于数据可获取性不易,极大的限制了该手段的应用;模型等定量识别方法较少采用,结果的精度较差是其主要弊端。本文在综合以往学者研究的基础上,提出城市群界定的标准体系;运用区域作用组合模型,得出城市群的识别体系。通过模型与实证相结合,更加高效和精确地识别城市群。通过研究,为城市群的界定提供一种研究思路,并为城市群识别的操作层面提供了一种测度手段。     

黑龙江省湿地法律定义评析

通过对国内外湿地定义的分析,结合黑龙江省湿地的特征,运用比较分析的方法探讨进一步完善黑龙江省湿地的法律定义。研究表明：黑龙江省湿地法律定义应当与《国际重要湿地公约》相适应;要包括天然湿地和人工建造的部分湿地;应当将湿地的认证从定义中删除,在《黑龙江省湿地保护条例》湿地管理一章中加以规定。《黑龙江省湿地保护条例》中湿地的定义可以表述为：“湿地是指本省范围内天然或人工形成的、包括常年或季节性存在的沼泽地、湿原、泥炭地或水域地带等”。