赤潮藻对桡足类摄食、产卵及孵化影响的研究进展

本文对近年来有关赤潮藻对桡足类摄食、产卵及孵化的影响研究动态进行了综述。一般认为，海洋桡足类对赤潮藻存在着潜在的调控作用，但近年来的研究发现，某些赤潮藻反过来对桡足类的生长、发育、产卵等生理状态也存在着负面影响。文中提出在今后赤潮研究中，应加强对有毒赤潮藻和桡足类相互作用和特异性的研究。     

厦门市无居民海岛植被生态保护方案与规划

本文分析了厦门市无居民海岛植被生态现状与存在的问题,阐述了海岛生态功能定位,提出3种海岛生态保护方案,拟定了海岛生态保护措施及植被绿化规划,并得到当地政府的采纳.     

海岛生态综合评价方法探讨

从海岛生态状态及生态服务功能两个方面，探讨了海岛生态综合评价的指标和方法．其中海岛生态状态评价从海岛景观和生态系统两个层次进行分析．前者主要利用3S技术所获取的信息，从宏观角度定量分析海岛景观格局变化；后者从海岛生物和非生物环境两部分，采用与历史资料及相关环境质量标准对比的方法，分析海岛岛陆、潮间带及近海海域生态系统现状．海岛生态服务功能评价则从海岛物质生产、调节功能、支持功能及社会文化功能4个方面，分析海岛生态系统的服务能力．文中提出的海岛生态综合评价的框架、方法，可为海岛生态系统综合评价与管理提供参考．     

福建东山湾浮游动物的种类组成和分布特点

1981年7月至1982年6月(每月1次)的周年调查结果表明:福建东山湾浮游动物的种类组成较丰富,已鉴定有176种,其中,暖水种占大多数;以暖水种和暖温带种为优势,分别在夏季和冬季形成总生物量高峰;阶段性浮游幼虫,特别是短尾类溞状幼虫等在夏季总生物量高峰中占有重要地位,以及多样性指数和均匀度的季节变化较显著等,显示了亚热带河口-港湾区浮游动物生态的基本特点。此外,东山湾浮游动物总生物量、种类数及多样性指数等的平面分布规律都较明显。     

大亚湾拟菱形藻水华及其在生物群落中的生态地位

对2000年4~5月藻类水华高发期大亚湾澳头海域的拟菱形藻进行逐日调查,并对其与浮游植物、浮游动物的相关关系进行分析.调查初期,整个生物群落的种类组成数量都相对贫乏;拟菱形藻数量急剧增长,最高的测站密度可达2.93×106个/dm3.拟菱形藻水华的组成种类有拟极细拟菱形藻和尖刺拟菱形藻两种,以尖刺拟菱形藻稍占优势.水华形成中其他种类硅藻和甲藻在种类组成和数量上也有一定程度的增加.分析表明,拟菱形藻在浮游植物群落的种间竞争中具有优势,并成为春季硅藻水华的最重要的组成者.桡足类等浮游动物对拟菱形藻的下行控制并不能明显抑制拟菱形藻的增长及水华的产生,这与其偏爱以其他种类藻类为食有关.以上因素外加拟菱形藻对环境的广泛适应性促使其在该水域成为最常见的赤潮生物之一.     

Studies on island intertidal benthic ecology in Fujian

lNreomicrlowIntertidal zone is an important type of wetIand easystem on the earth as it is in the tranai-tion zone between 1and and the and subject to frequent human interferences. Since the inter-tidal sone is subject to a1ternative physical and chemical actions of land and as, the intertidalzone has a compticated and changeable environment. The studies on intertidal zon ecobeyhave always attracted much attention for the past decades (Stephensons, l972; MOrtons,l983: Huang and Zhu, l998; Y…     

湖泊遥感研究进展

湖泊萎缩、湖泊污染以及湖泊富营养化是人类面临的主要湖泊环境问题。遥感技术的诞生给大范围的、全面深入的湖泊环境变化研究带来了巨大的福音，它克服了人类对湖泊有限的考察和小范围定点观测实验研究的局限性。本文简要综述了国内外遥感技术在湖泊动态变化、湖区洪涝灾害、湖泊物理参数、湖泊生物生态、湖泊水文水质、湖泊冰情等方面的研究进展情况，并论述了遥感技术在湖泊环境变化研究中的未来发展趋势。     

Cracking the Code: a legal geography and political ecological perspective on vegetation clearing regulations

ABSTRACT

In 2014, the New South Wales (NSW) state parliament passed legislation implementing a new Code of Practice (‘Code 10/50’) granting property owners in bushfire-prone areas the right to clear all trees within 10 m, and all vegetation within 50 m, of residences without prior approval from authorities. The Code is a significant departure from previous regimes which often required permits for vegetation clearance. The Code was introduced in direct response to bushfire threat in the wake of the 2013–14 bushfires in NSW. However, the Code has been plagued by controversy, with accusations of abuse in areas with little or no bushfire history, and a lack of any substantial environmental protections, particularly prior to a review in August 2015. In this paper we examine the debates surrounding the enactment of the Code and consider the way in which particular justifications for the Code permeated parliamentary deliberations. Our investigation relies on unpacking how the Code emerged in order to shed light on how a very controversial policy came into being. We adopt a legal geography approach, together with insights from political ecology, to demonstrate that changes in regulatory processes have the potential to fundamentally alter our landscapes.     

Recognizing Carbon Forestry’s Uneven Geography: A Response to Purdon and the Structure-Agency Dichotomy That Never Was

We here respond to the critique by Purdon of an article on carbon forestry that we published in this journal last year (Carton and Andersson). While we welcome critical engagements with our work, Purdon’s argument is wide of the mark and appears based largely on misconceptions regarding our theoretical entry point and empirical findings. Underlying this are fundamental disagreements about the nature of carbon forestry, structure-agency dynamics, and how to understand environmental interventions in the global South more broadly. We argue that we are unlikely to “find common ground” in our respective analyses of the Trees for Global Benefits project unless we share a common understanding of the unequal power relations and fundamental geographical unevenness within which carbon projects operate. Contrary to what Purdon argues, this position has nothing to do with ignoring local benefits, nor with denying the agency of the smallholder farmers who participate in the project. We see no contradiction between an analysis that does justice to the various structural conditions that frame carbon forest projects, and a recognition of local agency.